DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Is Gravitational Force Dependent on a Falling Object's Speed?
Next: Roberts: Explain to Gisse what a Metric is!!
From: Autymn D. C. on 23 Dec 2009 09:30 On Dec 20, 7:05 pm, "THE BORG" <b...(a)gone.com> wrote: > "Zinnic" <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote in message > > news:8c80dd5e-2d54-4c07-91c2-ed218a624f7d(a)3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 15, 8:47 pm, "bigflet...(a)gmail.com" > <bigflet...(a)gmail.com> > wrote:> On Dec 15, 6:07 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:53:49 -0800 (PST), darwinist > > > > At any rate, let me outline what were up against. The > > > discovery of the world's first scientific proof of God > > > is a > > > fait accompli. It is signed sealed and delivered and has > > > been published in the peer-reviewed literature.- Hide > > > quoted text - > > Brian, I guess George will find nothing to disagree with > here! > > What people don't realize is that there would not only be > scientific proof of God, but there would be mathematical > proof, artistic proof, natural proof, synchronous proof, and > proof would occur in every which way. And there isn't; I even wrote a loghical and mathematical proof against the three kinds of gods on Wikipedia's Humanities help desk one time, and nobody could rebut. I also drew about 40 readers to my Beliefnet profile where there are proofs and links to scriptural refutations. > The fact that Earth exists is proof. > What more do you require? > Only idiots think Earth came out of nothing and nowhere with > no cause nor reason nor intelligent design. God = out of nothing and nowhere and no cause nor reason God = not intelligent Earth is proof of the Earth. Everything makes itself. Get the hell out, dolt. [snip addl-babbl] > Evidence and proof that matter is illusory are everywhere. > THE BORG There are no illusions, only delusions. -Aut http://youtube.com/alysdexia http://twitter.com/alysdexia/favorites
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on 23 Dec 2009 12:30 X-No-Archive: Yes On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:18:23 -0800
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on 23 Dec 2009 12:31 X-No-Archive: Yes On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:27:38 -0800
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on 23 Dec 2009 12:32 X-No-Archive: Yes On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:02:55 -0800
From: Bernhard Schornak on 24 Dec 2009 23:36
George Hammond wrote: >>>>> 15-16 cps correlates directly with intelligence (Reidel 1966 >>>>> and many others including Lehrl and Fischer (1990). Say FFF >>>>> is 40 cps. According to Lehrl and fischer's equation >>>>> (1990): >>>>> IQ = 5 (mental speed in bits/sec) + 25 >>> >>>>> Thus if the average person's PFF is 15 frames/sec his IQ is >>>>> 100. On the other hand if we take the flicker fusion >>>>> frequency to be 40 cps and assume that a person has a PFF of >>>>> 40 cps he would have to have an IQ of 40x5+25=225 and it is >>>>> doubtful that anyone alive has an IQ that high. Hi George! Still alive and still preaching. Seems you did not learn anything from the PFF test I posted a few years ago... ;) Merry Christmas and a happy new year. May the Schwartz be with you! Bernhard Schornak P.S.: Actually, I still can see 60 single pictures in my simple animated GIF. Its running on a quadcore 2.6 GHz AMD box - causing less than 1% CPU load on one of the cores. Maybe my IQ isn't just mere 225, but 60x5+25=325? P.S.S: Why do you doubt that anyone has an IQ low as 225? At least this 'fully frown man' thingy should beat my 325 with ease, shouldn't s/he? |