Frustrated with Apple Care service
in [Mac Applications]
|
From: dorayme on 2 Dec 2006 16:18 In article <1hppp9s.u9v9yymapixsN%soorod(a)bellnotnorth.invalid>, soorod(a)bellnotnorth.invalid (Sue Rodgers) wrote: > Dear, you remind me of the child who cries out, "Mommy, Timmy keeps on > hitting me back!" What a pity. -- dorayme
From: Dave Balderstone on 2 Dec 2006 17:45 In article <doraymeRidThis-ADE84A.08162803122006(a)news-vip.optusnet.com.au>, dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > In article > <021220060042542758%dave(a)N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca>, > Dave Balderstone <dave(a)N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote: > > > In article > > <doraymeRidThis-FBC621.16123302122006(a)news-vip.optusnet.com.au>, > > dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > > Sue! You are doing it again! You are waving your hand and not > > > showing the exact chapter and verse > > > > Exact chapter and verse? > > > > <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.apps/browse_thread/thread/4 > > b4bc3e25e59684d/28dc556b45e15878?lnk=st&q=drugs+dorayme+balderstone&rnum > > =2#28dc556b45e15878> > > > > I give an analogy to be thinking through an issue and the > dobberman in you is doing the listening: > > "Are you drunk or on drugs?" > > I protest: > > Can you not see I am trying to think through what is actually > happening? Please do not be rude to me. > > And then you claim, you little miserable insincere bleating > wretch: > > "No, I didn't see that. I wasn't being rude, either. It was a > sincere question, based on the content of your post." > > A little later, me having by now explained it was an analogy > meant well, you add, to stoke the fire in your pompous manner: > > "And, I note, you didn't answer my question." > > Which just about says everything, you little prick. What it says is that you still haven't answered the question. I'll ask again... Were you drunk or on drugs at that time? A simple yes or no will suffice. And, BTW, "little" really doesn't apply in an context you may have intended.
From: Dave Balderstone on 2 Dec 2006 17:45 In article <doraymeRidThis-73000B.08180503122006(a)news-vip.optusnet.com.au>, dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > In article <1hppp9s.u9v9yymapixsN%soorod(a)bellnotnorth.invalid>, > soorod(a)bellnotnorth.invalid (Sue Rodgers) wrote: > > > Dear, you remind me of the child who cries out, "Mommy, Timmy keeps on > > hitting me back!" > > What a pity. isn't it just, toothpick....
From: Sue Rodgers on 2 Dec 2006 17:54 Dave Balderstone <dave(a)N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote: > > What a pity. > > isn't it just, toothpick.... You KNOW you really aren't helping matters, don't you? You've become iconic to her, the all-that-is-bad-and-evil-in-Usenet totem, if you will. Everything negative that's said about her in a newsgroup is somehow, in her mind, your fault, and you're doing all you can to feed that. Which, of course, is your prerogative... -- Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see...
From: dorayme on 2 Dec 2006 18:36
In article <021220061645028411%dave(a)N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca>, Dave Balderstone <dave(a)N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote: > In article > <doraymeRidThis-ADE84A.08162803122006(a)news-vip.optusnet.com.au>, > dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > In article > > <021220060042542758%dave(a)N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca>, > > Dave Balderstone <dave(a)N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote: > > > > > In article > > > <doraymeRidThis-FBC621.16123302122006(a)news-vip.optusnet.com.au>, > > > dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > Sue! You are doing it again! You are waving your hand and not > > > > showing the exact chapter and verse > > > > > > Exact chapter and verse? > > > > > > <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.apps/browse_thread/thread/4 > > > b4bc3e25e59684d/28dc556b45e15878?lnk=st&q=drugs+dorayme+balderstone&rnum > > > =2#28dc556b45e15878> > > > > > > > I give an analogy to be thinking through an issue and the > > dobberman in you is doing the listening: > > > > "Are you drunk or on drugs?" > > > > I protest: > > > > Can you not see I am trying to think through what is actually > > happening? Please do not be rude to me. > > > > And then you claim, you little miserable insincere bleating > > wretch: > > > > "No, I didn't see that. I wasn't being rude, either. It was a > > sincere question, based on the content of your post." > > > > A little later, me having by now explained it was an analogy > > meant well, you add, to stoke the fire in your pompous manner: > > > > "And, I note, you didn't answer my question." > > > > Which just about says everything, you little prick. > > What it says is that you still haven't answered the question. I'll ask > again... Were you drunk or on drugs at that time? > Your attempts to dissemble are pathetic. > A simple yes or no will suffice. > Suffice for what? I can imagine you fooling some of the slimier members of your gang with this. But most people will see though it, of course. Why are you bothering? What are you achieving? You remind everyone how you begin these unpleasant episodes with your impudence. Now you add repeated layers of insincerity. > And, BTW, "little" really doesn't apply in an context you may have > intended. This sort of crude boast will get you nowhere. To call someone a little prick down here is not really to refer to anything down there. it is to refer to your small mindededness. -- dorayme |