Frustrated with Apple Care service
in [Mac Applications]
|
From: patrick j on 1 Dec 2006 18:41 James Glidewell wrote: > Please leave. For your own sake. And ours. Firstly I will write that I hope that dorayme remains participating in the comp.sys.mac.* forums and ignores a statement such as this. It is the height of arrogance to think that you have the right to declare that someone should leave a discussion forum. If anyone is to leave I would hope it would be people who mistakenly believe that it is their role to decide who should or should not participate. dorayme has been treated very badly by a small group of people on this forum and I am very glad he has not been bullied off it which has been their intention. I remember the thread that is being discussed, and anyone can visit it; it is clear to see that dorayme was ganged up on by a group of very small minded people. My own feeling is that doraymes best way of dealing with it is to kill-file the group of individuals involved, but it is dorayme's decision as to how he should proceed. I also feel that if people do not like dorayme's posts then they should just kill-file them. To me that is obvious. Dorayme's writing style is different from that of the group who are trying to "expel" him, and I believe that it is purely for being different that dorayme is being rounded upon in this manner. Personally I will not be commenting again in this thread. -- Patrick Brighton, UK <http://www.patrickjames.me.uk>
From: Dave Balderstone on 1 Dec 2006 18:48 In article <0001HW.C1966E2C00699262B019F94F(a)News.Individual.Net>, patrick j <patrick(a)jamesnews.orangehome.co.uk> wrote: > Dorayme's writing style is different from that of the group who are > trying to "expel" him, and I believe that it is purely for being > different that dorayme is being rounded upon in this manner. What utter twaddle.
From: Sue Rodgers on 1 Dec 2006 18:53 patrick j <patrick(a)jamesnews.orangehome.co.uk> wrote: > Dorayme's writing style is different from that of the group who are > trying to "expel" him, and I believe that it is purely for being > different that dorayme is being rounded upon in this manner. You're completely missing the actual issue -- dorayme has been specifically going after Dave Balderstone for months. All else you see is secondary to that. -- Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see...
From: Ura Dippschit on 1 Dec 2006 19:05 In article <doraymeRidThis-812F5D.10022902122006(a)news-vip.optusnet.com.au>, dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > I _am_ leaving you Glidwell, bye bye... Yeah, right. Full of shite you is.
From: Dave Balderstone on 1 Dec 2006 19:15
In article <1hpokcn.1ua6jjl1x9pkp6N%soorod(a)bellnotnorth.invalid>, Sue Rodgers <soorod(a)bellnotnorth.invalid> wrote: > patrick j <patrick(a)jamesnews.orangehome.co.uk> wrote: > > > Dorayme's writing style is different from that of the group who are > > trying to "expel" him, and I believe that it is purely for being > > different that dorayme is being rounded upon in this manner. > > You're completely missing the actual issue -- dorayme has been > specifically going after Dave Balderstone for months. All else you see > is secondary to that. It's tiresome, because she's so lousy at it. I enjoy a good battle of wits, but not with someone who brings a toothpick to a knife fight... |