Frustrated with Apple Care service
in [Mac Applications]
|
From: Sue Rodgers on 26 Nov 2006 20:03 dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > If he does it to others, I won't come in. And yet, just today, you attacked him when he responded to a spammer. Then you defended the spammer. -- Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see...
From: dorayme on 26 Nov 2006 20:52 In article <1hpfdi7.13ofrtx1nk8p3jN%mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com>, mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote: > dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > Yes... yes... but so what? > > J.J. asked about it when I corrected him in addressing you as a > male-type person. You said "All I remember is that 5-6 months ago there was one thread in which a bunch of people jumped on her when she made a couple of especially illogical posts, and for some reason she singled Dave out as a target. She's been hounding him ever since". I asked you back this slur on me up. To show how easy it was to miss any reason why i would have been displeased with your low hero. You waved your hand to some thread. I said whereabouts is the illogicality and then you started downgrading your claims and when I challenged some of these downgraded ones, you did not come up with the goods and started moving some other goal posts while at it. Mike, if you are going to say horrid things, don't pretend it is based on anything but silly impressions. I deserve deep study, not casual impressions. I am not some sort of stimulus for some godforsaken experiment in animal conditioning. I am dorayme, a visitor to your earth. Show some respect. -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 26 Nov 2006 20:57 In article <1hpfdsp.kuvn971bldpxoN%mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com>, mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote: > dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > Dear Sue, you misunderstand. > > I'm sorry, but you have one understanding and seemingly everyone else in > USENET, at least in the comp.sys.mac hierarchy, has another of what's > transpired between you and him. You just keep making these vague claims. What has transpired is on record. If you have not the time or patience to look at this record and see all in context, then fine but do not pretend to know things you are not prepared to evidence when challenged. -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 28 Nov 2006 15:43 In article <1hpigmv.147rds87z5a7mN%snipe(a)spambin.fsnet.co.uk>, snipe(a)spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) wrote: > dorayme <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > I could swear you think I am being a bit childish? > > I can't imagine why you might think that. Do us all a favour and > just drop it, eh? If only for the sake of the signal to noise ratio. OK. (I just looked at that url you gave. Good one. Cruel! <g>) -- dorayme
From: dorayme on 1 Dec 2006 18:02
In article <J9EHvy.740(a)news.boeing.com>, James Glidewell <jimglidewell(a)comcast.net> wrote: > Please leave. For your own sake. And ours. Something wrong with your killfile facilities? I _am_ leaving you Glidwell, bye bye... -- dorayme |