GOD=G_uv Measure your IQ in 30 seconds
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?
Next: What keeps electrons spinning around their nucleus?
From: Guy Svenhardt on 28 Mar 2005 00:51 times of the pouring out of the Spirit of God on this town, though in some of them it was very remarkable, it reached no further then; the neighboring towns all around continued unmoved. This work seemed to be at its greatest height in this town in the former part of the spring, in March and April. At that time God's work in the conversion of souls was carried on amongst us in so wonderful a manner, that, so far as I can judge, it appears to have been at the rate at least of four persons in a day; or near thirty in a week, take one with another, for five or six weeks together. When God in so remarkable a manner took the work into His own hands, there was as much done in a day or two, as at ordinary times, with all endeavors that men can use, and with such a blessing as we commonly have, is done in a year. I am very sensible, how apt many would be, if they should see the account I have here given, presently to think with themselves that I am very fond of making a great many converts, and of magnifying the matter; and to think that for want of judgment, I take every religious pang, and enthusiastic conceit, for saving conversion. I do not much wonder if they should be apt to think so; and, for this reason, I have forborne to publish an account of this great work of God, though I have often been solicited. But having now a special call to give an account of it, upon mature consideration I thought it might not be beside my duty to declare this amazing work, as it appeared to me to be indeed divine, and to conceal no part of the glory of it; leaving it with God to take care of the credit of His own work, and running the venture of any censorious thoughts, which might be enterta ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
From: Guy Svenhardt on 28 Mar 2005 01:54 our own good. It must teach us the remedies for these infirmities and the means of obtaining these remedies. Let us, therefore, examine all the religions of the world and see if there be any other than the Christian which is sufficient for this purpose. Shall it be that of the philosophers, who put forward, as the chief good, the good which is in ourselves? Is this the true good? Have they found the remedy for our ills? Is man's pride cured by placing him on an equality with God? Have those who have made us equal to the brutes, or the Mohammedans who have offered us earthly pleasures as the chief good even in eternity, produced the remedy for our lusts? What religion, then, will teach us to cure pride and lust? What religion will, in fact, teach us our good, our duties, the weakness which turns us from them, the cause of this weakness, the remedies which can cure it, and the means of obtaining these remedies? All other religions have not been able to do so. Let us see what the wisdom of God will do. "Expect neither truth," she says, "nor consolation from men. I am she who formed you, and who alo ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
From: Michael Moroney on 28 Mar 2005 14:51 "George Hammond" <nowhere1(a)nospam.net> writes: >by differences in "picture fusion frequency". A 7 yr old can only >see 10 frames/sec before it becomes a 'movie'... a 15 year old >can see 15 individual frames/sec before it fuses into a 'movie'. That's >33% higher speed... therefore, 1/3 of the world must be INVISIBLE to >a 7 yr old as compared to a 15 yr old! Assuming that statement about viewable frame rate is correct (seems unlikely), that statement about 1/3rd of the world being invisible to a 7 year old assumes falsely that 1/3rd of events happen at a rate between 10 and 15 frames per second. > Not only that... it is a fact that no ADULT actually ever reaches full >growth! (This is known as the 'Secular Trend', and has been known for >100 yrs). HENCE baseball players, who are more "fully grown" than >average people, ... must be able to see another 15 or 20% of "reality" >which is actually INVISIBLE to the average sportsfan like you and me! So baseball players are closer to God than ordinary folk? >Brilliant Jillarountown!! ... I never even thought about Baseball! >Of COURSE... the entire sport is a spectacular proof of the SPOG! So they are? Should people be bowing toward Fenway Park instead of Mecca when they pray? Or is it a long-term thing and we should bow toward Yankee Stadium instead? Cooperstown? >TRUE...... absolute fact......... Barry Bonds can actually read the word >"Wilson" printed on the ball, as it speeds over the plate! I take it that television and movies (30 fps & 24 fps respectively) are completely unwatchable by the demi-god Barry Bonds? -- -Mike
From: stew dean on 29 Mar 2005 02:46 Ferrous Patella wrote: > news:1111995820.764314.46150(a)g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com by "stew dean" > <stewdean(a)gmail.com>: > [...] > > Your degree idicates you knew enough about physics to pass a degree > > at the time you took your degree - that's it. Legaly it means the exact > > > > same - not that you now know anything. By all means check but you'll > > find I'm right again. > > > > > > c) I don't believe your scientific knowledge is anyway credible now for > > > > many reasons - the main one being your lack of demonstration of > > understanding. > > > > Currently I'm very suspect you even took a degree based upon your > > avoidance of a chance to totally demolish me. If you had a good > > knowledge of physics you could easily ask me questions I couldnt answer > > and I'd hold my hand up. > [...] > > Hammond's degree was handed to him as a consolation prize when he failed > his Ph.D.. > I think that was his 'second'. He only has one degree that he studied for, at least I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt on that one. There's nothing solid that he even took that one. He sure couldnt pass a degree of any kind now. Stew Dean
From: stew dean on 29 Mar 2005 02:50
George Hammond wrote: > "David Iain Greig" <greig(a)ediacara.org> wrote in message > news:slrnd4dc85.34t.greig(a)darwin.ediacara.org... > > George Hammond <nowhere1(a)nospam.net> wrote: > > > > > > "stew dean" <stewdean(a)gmail.com> wrote in > > > message news:1111877375.501550.283270(a)l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > > > ><snip> > > ><snip> > > ><snip> > > ><snip> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Perhaps you could ask me a physics question - see if I really am an > > >> idiot - an please nothing you've made up. I'll either answer it or > > >> admit I don't know. Your shot. > > > > > > [Hammond] > > > Sure: State your CV in Physics... punk. > > > > I have a B.A.Sc. in Engineering Physics and an M.Sc. in Medical Biophysics > > where I did heteronuclear NMR studies. > > > > You're still an insane clown who's a failed scientist. > > > > --D. > > > > [Hammond] > You're a psychotic halfwit who isn't fit to be a moderator. George, The problem with appealing to authority, as you do when you attempt to hide behind your degree, is there are better qualified and career scientists on this group. Stew |