Google abandons Windows
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Pd on 6 Jun 2010 09:41 Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > Or, like others, are you of the opinion that it's OK for Rowland to > harass the blind, the dyslexic and others? No, it's not OK. So what are you going to do about it? Does spouting bile make up for someone spouting bile? Does it suddenly make everything sweet and lovely, because this time the bile is being thrown at a person who has previously spouted bile? Is twice as much bile better somehow? > Look at the many nasty posts made by those preening themselves Preening's okay. As long as it's not overweening preening. -- Pd
From: Pd on 6 Jun 2010 09:44 James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > What starts as normal discussion always ends up the same here, lets gang > up on the blind one who dishes back to Rowland. Yay, go James. Dish it back to Rowland, because that really shows him he can't get away with it. Good on you for sticking up for yourself. Nobody pushes the James around, he can be just as rude and obnoxious right back again. Two people being rude and obnoxious is so much better than just one, yeah, cos it really show him we won't put up with it. And what the hell has being blind got to do with it? -- Pd
From: James Jolley on 6 Jun 2010 09:50 On 2010-06-06 14:44:36 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) said: > James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > >> What starts as normal discussion always ends up the same here, lets gang >> up on the blind one who dishes back to Rowland. > > Yay, go James. Dish it back to Rowland, because that really shows him he > can't get away with it. Good on you for sticking up for yourself. Nobody > pushes the James around, he can be just as rude and obnoxious right back > again. Two people being rude and obnoxious is so much better than just > one, yeah, cos it really show him we won't put up with it. > > And what the hell has being blind got to do with it? Ask Rowland. He's the one who constantly likes to tell us how he could care less if someone's blind or not. You won't though, of course.
From: James Jolley on 6 Jun 2010 10:11 On 2010-06-06 15:05:02 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) said: > > There's no point in shouting at Rowland. All he does is get more and > more spiteful, angry, irrational and paranoid. If James starts doing the > same, hopefully more people will killfile him too, and stop interacting > with him. However, if he continues to behave like a sane person, then > it's worth continuing to interact with him. Like Ian - I can't be bothered with James Piper? Seems to me that there are different rules for some and not others.
From: Steve Firth on 6 Jun 2010 10:05
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > Why, because you say so? > > > > > > Yes. Because unlike you, I'm not nasty. > > > > Untrue, you're nasty but you don't realise when you are being so. You're > > happy to beat on a blind man for example. > > An example of which would be..? The long-running attacks on James by the PolitBuro. |