From: Steve Firth on 6 Jun 2010 07:04 Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: > Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > > > This is the warm, considerate not-nasty side of Peter Ceresole is it? If > > I've "flipped" then by your standards you have to be nice to me. Or are > > you being a hypocrite, again? > > Don't be more bloody stupid than you have to be. I have never attacked a > blind person here. Oh yes you have. Perhaps you don't see your attacks and constant undermining of a blind individual as attacks, but that is what they are. As your attacks on me, but what the heck, off you go again.
From: Peter Ceresole on 6 Jun 2010 07:29 Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > Oh yes you have. Perhaps you don't see your attacks and constant > undermining of a blind individual as attacks, but that is what they are. They certainly aren't. If you think that, you're simply demonstrating your inadequacy at understanding human beings. Maybe you are physically blind? I have no idea. But it's never come up. My infrequent attacks on you arise simply because you are the most obnoxious person here. -- Peter
From: Steve Firth on 6 Jun 2010 07:22 Ian Piper <ianpiper(a)mac.com> wrote: > I'm a bit confused about the above. Presumably "all of you" in the > sense of - well, "all of you people in this group" No, it means "all of the clique". The little group who seem to think that they own this group and others must conform to the rules that they lay down. A key rule they are trying to establish at the moment seems to be that no one may object to Rowland's behaviour. And those individuals have acted in response to James in exactly the manner that they object to. That 'h' word, again.
From: Jim on 6 Jun 2010 07:54 Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > > > Why, because you say so? > > > > Yes. Because unlike you, I'm not nasty. > > Untrue, you're nasty but you don't realise when you are being so. You're > happy to beat on a blind man for example. An example of which would be..? Jim -- "Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: Steve Firth on 6 Jun 2010 07:52
Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote: > My infrequent attacks on you arise simply because you are the most > obnoxious person here. Refusing to kowtow to your (incorrect) world view does not make someone "obnoxious" however your frequent attacks do mark you out as a hypocrite. |