Google abandons Windows
in [UK Mac]
|
From: T i m on 5 Jun 2010 17:40 On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:29:51 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote: >T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > >> She even noticed a little row Maltesers carefully placed on an old >> typewriter they have in there ... except no one had Maltesers ... > >Ew? Yup, all in a days work apparently. ;-( Her place seems to be one of the best though (recently audited and scored 97/100 or summat) and they do things like have a rack of hats and handbags that people can put on if they want (most of the ladies get a handbag first thing and carry it all day). ;-) T i m
From: T i m on 5 Jun 2010 17:44 On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:29:51 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote: >T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > >> She even noticed a little row Maltesers carefully placed on an old >> typewriter they have in there ... except no one had Maltesers ... > >Ew? Yup, all in a days work apparently. ;-( Her place seems to be one of the best though (recently audited and scored 97/100 or summat) and they do things like have a rack of hats and handbags that people can put on if they want (most of the ladies get a handbag first thing and carry it all day). ;-) T i m
From: Pd on 5 Jun 2010 17:46 T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:29:51 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) > wrote: > > >T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > > > >> She even noticed a little row Maltesers carefully placed on an old > >> typewriter they have in there ... except no one had Maltesers ... > > > >Ew? > > Yup, all in a days work apparently. ;-( > > Her place seems to be one of the best though (recently audited and > scored 97/100 or summat) and they do things like have a rack of hats > and handbags that people can put on if they want (most of the ladies > get a handbag first thing and carry it all day). ;-) You said that already. -- Pd
From: T i m on 5 Jun 2010 18:08 On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 22:46:27 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote: >T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: > >> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:29:51 +0100, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) >> wrote: >> >> >T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: >> > >> >> She even noticed a little row Maltesers carefully placed on an old >> >> typewriter they have in there ... except no one had Maltesers ... >> > >> >Ew? >> >> Yup, all in a days work apparently. ;-( >> >> Her place seems to be one of the best though (recently audited and >> scored 97/100 or summat) and they do things like have a rack of hats >> and handbags that people can put on if they want (most of the ladies >> get a handbag first thing and carry it all day). ;-) > >You said that already. Four times it seems here? I think there may be some issues with VM atm as I'm having hiccups with both Usenet and mail and have been for a few days now. I think they are moving the email over to Googlmail and may have already dumped their support newsgroups (I just got the headers but couldn't get the bodies). The last messages looked like 'Farewells'? Cheers, T i m, im, im, im.
From: James Jolley on 5 Jun 2010 18:18
On 2010-06-05 21:32:38 +0100, Bernard Peek <bap(a)shrdlu.com> said: > On 05/06/10 20:11, Peter Ceresole wrote: >> James Jolley<jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: >> >>> Funny that, so speaking as a philosopher, it's reasonable to take digs >>> and smart arsed comments from people is it? McDonal seems to take pride >>> in whining about how ill he is, let him be ill off the internet then. >> >> He's ill. That's why he does it. What's ill is his brain, so no amount >> of reasoning can make any difference. Now imagine being locked into that >> situation. It must be terrifying- certainly horribly stressful and sad. >> So it's up to the people who *can* control their impulses to try to be >> kind to Rowland. I know he makes it almost impossible at times, but it's >> important. >> >> It's not a question of philosophy or of mental adequacy. Just plain >> kindness. > > Backed up by the law. Repeated attacks on someone known to be suffering > from a mental disability are very much illegal and could lead to > criminal prosecution and possible jail sentences. Bear in mind that > usenet posts are archived and could be cited as evidence. That works both ways however. He could try to take action or whatever he might think he can do, but I can argue i'm only standing up for myself. Let's face it, it's all about him on this group, always will be. |