Google is NOT my friend :-\
in [Mac Applications]
|
Prev: spam
Next: "Canceled opening the page" (Safari)
From: AV3 on 20 Nov 2009 17:47 Nick Naym wrote: > In article he3ouj$ss1$1(a)news.albasani.net, AV3 at arvimide(a)earthlink.net > wrote on 11/19/09 10:41 AM: > >> Nick Naym wrote: >>> In article he1tp4$8dl$1(a)news.albasani.net, AV3 at arvimide(a)earthlink.net >>> wrote on 11/18/09 5:51 PM: >>> >>>> Nick Naym wrote: >>>>> In article 171120091055449487%nospam(a)nospam.invalid, nospam at >>>>> nospam(a)nospam.invalid wrote on 11/17/09 11:55 AM: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <rowbotth-86259F.09422717112009(a)news.newsgroupdirect.com>, >>>>>> Rowbotth <rowbotth(a)telusplanet.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>> ... > > > > >> Spilling coffee out of a styrofoam cup is >> commonplace and not analogous to cutting yourself while using a knife. > > Bullshit. > The intellectual power of your argument is stunning. Case closed. -- ++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++ ||Arnold VICTOR, New York City, i. e., <arvimideQ(a)Wearthlink.net> || ||Arnoldo VIKTORO, Nov-jorkurbo, t. e., <arvimideQ(a)Wearthlink.net> || ||Remove capital letters from e-mail address for correct address/ || || Forigu majusklajn literojn el e-poŝta adreso por ĝusta adreso || ++====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====+====+=====+=====+=====+=====+====++
From: dorayme on 20 Nov 2009 18:26 In article <he76ao$5op$1(a)news.albasani.net>, AV3 <arvimide(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > Case closed. Why do the namby pambies, the ones that defend the nanny state, the ones that do not see the large and cumulative effects of court decisions like this on society, the ones that cannot see the forest for the trees, the ones that have not a single inkling of the domino effects of constant and tiresome pleadings for damages for the result of actions that could be avoided had the claimant been more reasonably careful or simply more lucky, the ones who cannot connect up issues in one microscopic case with issues in many other cases, the ones that seem never to understand basic principles, always seem to be closing this case? what are they so frightened of? -- dorayme
From: Wes Groleau on 20 Nov 2009 22:44 dorayme wrote: > handle is the big culprit? Should car manufacturers be liable for not > making their vehicles unable to go past 30 mph? The mere numbers of Absolutely! And tobacco companies should be liable for lung cancer, and electricians and plumbers should be fined for putting electrical outlets and water faucets in the same building. And I choked on a hot dog while laughing at a Usenet post. My ISP is going to pay out the nose for that! -- Wes Groleau Change is inevitable. Conservatives should learn that "inevitable" is not a synonym for "bad." Liberals need to learn that "inevitable" is not a synonym for "good." -- WWG
From: dorayme on 21 Nov 2009 02:31 In article <he7nmv$8hc$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Wes Groleau <Groleau+news(a)FreeShell.org> wrote: > dorayme wrote: > > handle is the big culprit? Should car manufacturers be liable for not > > making their vehicles unable to go past 30 mph? The mere numbers of > > Absolutely! And tobacco companies should be liable for lung cancer, > and electricians and plumbers should be fined for putting electrical > outlets and water faucets in the same building. > > And I choked on a hot dog while laughing at a Usenet post. > My ISP is going to pay out the nose for that! I had a rather nasty accident slipping in a public bathing area once and it was a big bother getting over it, there was a slippery surface. The council could have done something about this considering the vast sums they otherwise wasted on more frivolous things. However I believe they should be held *less responsible* for the things that *more care* by citizens would avoid. I was not particularly careless. There were some odd circumstances to do with unusual low tide, exposed slippery rock slabs... I was just standing still, amazingly, prior to entering the sea. But a slight correction in my balance and... well I won't bore you with the details much fond as I am with issues concerning myself... <g> -- dorayme
From: Nick Naym on 21 Nov 2009 10:15
In article he76ao$5op$1(a)news.albasani.net, AV3 at arvimide(a)earthlink.net wrote on 11/20/09 5:47 PM: > Nick Naym wrote: >> In article he3ouj$ss1$1(a)news.albasani.net, AV3 at arvimide(a)earthlink.net >> wrote on 11/19/09 10:41 AM: >> >>> Nick Naym wrote: >>>> In article he1tp4$8dl$1(a)news.albasani.net, AV3 at arvimide(a)earthlink.net >>>> wrote on 11/18/09 5:51 PM: >>>> >>>>> Nick Naym wrote: >>>>>> In article 171120091055449487%nospam(a)nospam.invalid, nospam at >>>>>> nospam(a)nospam.invalid wrote on 11/17/09 11:55 AM: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <rowbotth-86259F.09422717112009(a)news.newsgroupdirect.com>, >>>>>>> Rowbotth <rowbotth(a)telusplanet.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... >>>> ... >> >> >> >> >>> Spilling coffee out of a styrofoam cup is >>> commonplace and not analogous to cutting yourself while using a knife. >> >> Bullshit. >> > > > The intellectual power of your argument is stunning. Case closed. > You sprinkle your posts with unsubstantiated claims, and respond with sarcastic remarks when someone takes issue? How about offering some substantiation of your blanket claims regarding the correct temperature of coffee, or that manufacturers of sharp knives are immune to prosecution for damage due to careless handling of their products, or that spilling coffee and cutting oneself are not analogous? Making unsubstantiated authoritative claims -- as if they were well-established immutable laws of nature -- certainly doesn't constitute a demonstration of the "intellectual power of your argument." -- iMac (24", 2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 320 GB HDD) � OS X (10.5.8) |