Gravity is a property of mass - not a property of space !!
in [Physics]
|
Prev: number of Coulomb Interactions as 231! as the largest number in physics Chapt 19 #222 Atom Totality
Next: Calculating the spectra and intensity of Helium, Lithium and Beryllium using only Rydberg-like formulas
From: mpc755 on 12 Jul 2010 16:28 On Jul 12, 4:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 12, 1:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 12, 1:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 11, 4:19 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Gravity is a property of mass!! > > > > it is *not* a property of space! > > > > Gravity is not a property. It is an interaction. It involves matter's > > > and energy's interaction with spacetime, and spacetime's interaction > > > with matter and energy. > > > And exactly what is the physical interaction between matter and energy > > and spacetime which causes gravity to exist? > > That is easily described by any book on general relativity. Would you > like some recommended reading? > > PD You can't explain anything can you? You can't explain how space curves but does not move. You can't explain what physically occurs in nature to cause gravity. You can't explain how a C-60 molecule enters, travels through, and exits multiple slits simultaneously without releasing energy requiring energy or having a change in momentum. You can't explain the dark matter ring feature here: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html All of the above are easily explained in Dark Matter Displacement. Let's start with a simple example to see how much you do not understand. Explain what occurs physically in nature in the following: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html The above is easily described in Dark Matter Displacement because the above is evidence of dark matter displaced by matter.
From: PD on 12 Jul 2010 17:08 On Jul 12, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 12, 4:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 1:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 12, 1:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 11, 4:19 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Gravity is a property of mass!! > > > > > it is *not* a property of space! > > > > > Gravity is not a property. It is an interaction. It involves matter's > > > > and energy's interaction with spacetime, and spacetime's interaction > > > > with matter and energy. > > > > And exactly what is the physical interaction between matter and energy > > > and spacetime which causes gravity to exist? > > > That is easily described by any book on general relativity. Would you > > like some recommended reading? > > > PD > > You can't explain anything can you? > Sure, I can, but why would I disgorge the contents of a book into an ascii newsgroup, when it is so much more efficient, productive, and appropriate if you ACTUALLY READ something? Mike Cavedon, for a software engineer, you're awfully freakin' lazy. I asked you a question: Would you like some recommended reading? PD
From: mpc755 on 12 Jul 2010 17:12 On Jul 12, 5:08 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 12, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 12, 4:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 12, 1:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 12, 1:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 11, 4:19 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Gravity is a property of mass!! > > > > > > it is *not* a property of space! > > > > > > Gravity is not a property. It is an interaction. It involves matter's > > > > > and energy's interaction with spacetime, and spacetime's interaction > > > > > with matter and energy. > > > > > And exactly what is the physical interaction between matter and energy > > > > and spacetime which causes gravity to exist? > > > > That is easily described by any book on general relativity. Would you > > > like some recommended reading? > > > > PD > > > You can't explain anything can you? > > Sure, I can, but why would I disgorge the contents of a book into an > ascii newsgroup, when it is so much more efficient, productive, and > appropriate if you ACTUALLY READ something? > > Mike Cavedon, for a software engineer, you're awfully freakin' lazy. > > I asked you a question: Would you like some recommended reading? > > PD http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html The above is evidence of dark matter displacement displaced by matter. The above is evidence of the correctness of Dark Matter Displacement.
From: mpc755 on 12 Jul 2010 17:15 On Jul 12, 5:08 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 12, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 12, 4:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 12, 1:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 12, 1:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 11, 4:19 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Gravity is a property of mass!! > > > > > > it is *not* a property of space! > > > > > > Gravity is not a property. It is an interaction. It involves matter's > > > > > and energy's interaction with spacetime, and spacetime's interaction > > > > > with matter and energy. > > > > > And exactly what is the physical interaction between matter and energy > > > > and spacetime which causes gravity to exist? > > > > That is easily described by any book on general relativity. Would you > > > like some recommended reading? > > > > PD > > > You can't explain anything can you? > > Sure, I can, but why would I disgorge the contents of a book into an > ascii newsgroup, when it is so much more efficient, productive, and > appropriate if you ACTUALLY READ something? > > Mike Cavedon, for a software engineer, you're awfully freakin' lazy. > > I asked you a question: Would you like some recommended reading? > > PD http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html The above is evidence of dark matter displaced by matter. The above is evidence of the correctness of Dark Matter Displacement.
From: mpc755 on 12 Jul 2010 17:25
On Jul 12, 5:08 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 12, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 12, 4:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 12, 1:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 12, 1:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 11, 4:19 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Gravity is a property of mass!! > > > > > > it is *not* a property of space! > > > > > > Gravity is not a property. It is an interaction. It involves matter's > > > > > and energy's interaction with spacetime, and spacetime's interaction > > > > > with matter and energy. > > > > > And exactly what is the physical interaction between matter and energy > > > > and spacetime which causes gravity to exist? > > > > That is easily described by any book on general relativity. Would you > > > like some recommended reading? > > > > PD > > > You can't explain anything can you? > > Sure, I can, but why would I disgorge the contents of a book into an > ascii newsgroup, when it is so much more efficient, productive, and > appropriate if you ACTUALLY READ something? > > Mike Cavedon, for a software engineer, you're awfully freakin' lazy. > > I asked you a question: Would you like some recommended reading? > > PD Explain the following: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html The above is evidence of dark matter displaced by matter. The above is evidence of the correctness of Dark Matter Displacement. |