From: Warren Oates on
In article <1jgj9so.3ajba71umb2ptN%jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz>,
jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote:

> How on Earth is this appropriate for comp.sys.mac newsgroups?

If Jesus Himself were to have a computer, it would be a MacBook Air.
--
Very old woody beets will never cook tender.
-- Fannie Farmer
From: Jeffrey Goldberg on
John wrote:

> The Lord loves you Mike and wants to save you from your sins. This
> comment is inappropriate.

You massively cross-posted a religious message. You got a massively
cross-posted religious discussion. But I guess that is OK for you. The
rest of us have to live with the consequences (big or trivial) of our
actions; but you magical forgiveness for yours. I guess that makes you
a better person.

-j


--
Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/
I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts
Reply-To address is valid
From: Jeffrey Goldberg on
Sherm Pendley wrote:
> Ian Gregory <ianji33(a)googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> On 2010-04-05, Sherm Pendley <spamtrap(a)shermpendley.com> wrote:
>>> Ian Gregory <ianji33(a)googlemail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> There is no "other side", a fact which
>>>
>>> ... is a belief, not a fact. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
>>
>> Whatever.
>
> No, not "whatever." Words have meaning, and "belief" and "fact" do not
> mean the same thing.

First we need to recognize that nothing (with the possible exception of
mathematical theorems) is known with absolute certainty. So if we want
the word "fact" to have any *useful* meaning it needs to include things
that for which our beliefs are sufficiently justified and close to
certain to merit being called "knowledge".

So for example, would you consider it a fact that the Sun
(approximately) is the center of our solar system? Is the heliocentric
view a "fact" for you?

Then let's go to an absence of evidence case. Is it a fact for you that
unicorns do not exist? And if so, what role does absence of evidence
play in that conclusion.

Basically there are cases in which absence of evidence is evidence of
absence (as in the unicorn case). The question then is whether life
after death is one of those cases. But before getting to that, you need
to get beyond this "absence of evidence" slogan.

-j

--
Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/
I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts
Reply-To address is valid
From: Jeffrey Goldberg on
John wrote:
> In article <1jghlbz.1nw9kt917d6nhdN%mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com>,
> mikePOST(a)TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote:
>
>>
>> Don't go around forcing your opinion on others and then say it's
>> "inappropriate" for others to respond with their opinions.
>
> You are right it was off topic.

Don't worry Jesus forgives you.

Two kids had become friends. One was a Christian and other an atheist.
But the atheist thought that he would try out this religion thing, so
he prays for a new bicycle. His Christian friend explains that that is
not how pray works and goes on to explain about Christianity more carefully.

The next day the atheist shows up with a new bicycle and thanks his
friend for enlightening him. "You see," he says, "I stole this bicycle
and prayed for forgiveness."

-j


--
Jeffrey Goldberg http://goldmark.org/jeff/
I rarely read HTML or poorly quoting posts
Reply-To address is valid
From: Warren Oates on
In article <8215drFjeuU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody(a)goldmark.org> wrote:

> The next day the atheist shows up with a new bicycle and thanks his
> friend for enlightening him. "You see," he says, "I stole this bicycle
> and prayed for forgiveness."

Emo Philips:
"When I was a kid, I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I
realized that the Lord, in his wisdom, didn't work that way. So I just
stole one and asked him to forgive me."

http://www.emophilips.com/home

He also says: "How many here have telekinetic powers? Raise my hand."
--
Very old woody beets will never cook tender.
-- Fannie Farmer