From: George Kerby on



On 4/4/10 4:38 PM, in article wF7un.57314$y13.56446(a)newsfe12.iad, "John
Wolf" <jwolf6589(a)THUNDERBIRDgmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/4/10 5:34 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> The Jewish Celebration commemorating the liberation of the Jews
>> from Pharoah.
>
> I see. To you who is Jesus? If you were to die today where would you go,
> and if you met Jesus on the other side, as well as every major religious
> figure, who would you believe and why?
>
>
> John
>

A bumper sticker read,

�Honk if you love Jesus. Text if you want to meet Him.�

From: Sherm Pendley on
Ian Gregory <ianji33(a)googlemail.com> writes:

> There is no "other side", a fact which

.... is a belief, not a fact. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

sherm--
From: Ian Gregory on
On 2010-04-05, Sherm Pendley <spamtrap(a)shermpendley.com> wrote:
> Ian Gregory <ianji33(a)googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> There is no "other side", a fact which
>
> ... is a belief, not a fact. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Whatever. I believe that it is a fact.

Ian

--
Ian Gregory
http://www.zenatode.org.uk/
From: Sherm Pendley on
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> writes:

> In article <m2hbnp6gbe.fsf(a)shermpendley.com>,
> Sherm Pendley <spamtrap(a)shermpendley.com> wrote:
>
>> > There is no "other side", a fact which
>>
>> ... is a belief, not a fact. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
>
> The fact is that in all of recorded and oral histories, there has been no
> evidence of an other side.

As I said - absence of proof is not proof of absence. You believe that
there is no "other side," and as it happens I also believe that - but
that's belief, not fact. A fact, by definition, can be tested and proven
to be true. The absence of an afterlife is no more testable than the
presence of one.

sherm--
From: Sherm Pendley on
Ian Gregory <ianji33(a)googlemail.com> writes:

> On 2010-04-05, Sherm Pendley <spamtrap(a)shermpendley.com> wrote:
>> Ian Gregory <ianji33(a)googlemail.com> writes:
>>
>>> There is no "other side", a fact which
>>
>> ... is a belief, not a fact. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
>
> Whatever.

No, not "whatever." Words have meaning, and "belief" and "fact" do not
mean the same thing.

If what you wrote is not what you meant, that's neither my fault nor
my problem. Buy a dictionary if you need one.

sherm--