Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
Next: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
From: Ignoramus22435 on 28 Apr 2010 19:05 The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is NOT a politician". This means two things: 1) That he is a liar. 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. i
From: Robert Baer on 28 Apr 2010 20:05 amdx wrote: > I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns. > It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate > for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by > the passing of Jack Murtha. > > http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/ > > "We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate > through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January." > > Mike > > VOTE FOR POGO!
From: krw on 28 Apr 2010 20:30 On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 <ignoramus22435(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: >The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. Really?! >He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >NOT a politician". Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! >This means two things: > >1) That he is a liar. You should know all about it, being a liar. >2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". > >I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).
From: Ignoramus22435 on 28 Apr 2010 20:39 On 2010-04-29, krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 ><ignoramus22435(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: > >>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > Really?! Yep. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/02/08/fight-shapes-up-for-murthas-seat/tab/article/ >>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >>NOT a politician". > > Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! Just trying my best. >>This means two things: >> >>1) That he is a liar. > > You should know all about it, being a liar. I do not say something like "I am NOT a usenet poster", unlike that Tim Burns politician who says he is NOT a politician. >>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". >> >>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). Possibly, but that does not make Tim Burns any more trustworthy. i
From: krw on 28 Apr 2010 20:50
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:39:53 -0500, Ignoramus22435 <ignoramus22435(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: >On 2010-04-29, krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 >><ignoramus22435(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: >> >>>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. >> >> Really?! > >Yep. > >http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/02/08/fight-shapes-up-for-murthas-seat/tab/article/ > >>>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >>>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >>>NOT a politician". >> >> Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! > >Just trying my best. Obviously. Are you still breathing? >>>This means two things: >>> >>>1) That he is a liar. >> >> You should know all about it, being a liar. > >I do not say something like "I am NOT a usenet poster", unlike that >Tim Burns politician who says he is NOT a politician. <shrug> *You* are still a liar. >>>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >>>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >>>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". >>> >>>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. >> >> Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). > >Possibly, but that does not make Tim Burns any more trustworthy. I made no statement otherwise. That doesn't change the fact that you're a liar, and an admitted ignoramus. |