Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
Next: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
From: Michael A. Terrell on 28 Apr 2010 21:12 Tim Williams wrote: > > "vaughn" <vaughnsimon(a)gmail.invalid> wrote in message > news:hra6me$oua$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > Please take your cross-posted, off-topic political spam and stick it > > "where the sun don't shine". > > Unfortunately, no sun shines on these newsgroups, sooo... Actually it does, but 'dorkmatter' sucks out all the photons. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 28 Apr 2010 21:13 Ignoramus22435 wrote: > > The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of > influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is > NOT a politician". > > This means two things: > > 1) That he is a liar. > > 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who > would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for > their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". > > I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago? -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Ignoramus22435 on 28 Apr 2010 21:32 On 2010-04-29, Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > Ignoramus22435 wrote: >> >> The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. >> >> He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >> influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >> NOT a politician". >> >> This means two things: >> >> 1) That he is a liar. >> >> 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >> would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >> their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". >> >> I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > > We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago? I am now sure why you are asking, but I do not live in Chicago. i
From: amdx on 28 Apr 2010 22:00 <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 > <ignoramus22435(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: > >>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > Really?! > >>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >>NOT a politician". > > Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! > >>This means two things: >> >>1) That he is a liar. > > You should know all about it, being a liar. > >>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". >> >>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a speaker Pelosi. Mike
From: George Herold on 28 Apr 2010 22:08
On Apr 28, 8:05 pm, Robert Baer <robertb...(a)localnet.com> wrote: > amdx wrote: > > I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns. > > It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate > > for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by > > the passing of Jack Murtha. > > >http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/ > > > "We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate > > through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January." > > > Mike > > VOTE FOR POGO! Hee Hee, "We have seen the enemy and he is...us." |