Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
Next: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
From: Ignoramus22435 on 28 Apr 2010 23:12 On 2010-04-29, amdx <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote: > ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message > news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 >> <ignoramus22435(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: >> >>>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. >> >> Really?! >> >>>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >>>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >>>NOT a politician". >> >> Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! >> >>>This means two things: >>> >>>1) That he is a liar. >> >> You should know all about it, being a liar. >> >>>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >>>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >>>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". >>> >>>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. >> >> Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). > > Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. > The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a > speaker Pelosi. I used to vote Republican, but, unfortunately, the Republican party has greatly decayed morally. This "I am NOT a politician" politician is a good example. I would like to see the Republican party reborn as an honest, intellectual, and enlightened organization. i i
From: mpm on 28 Apr 2010 23:15 On Apr 28, 8:13 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > Ignoramus22435 wrote: > > > The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > > He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of > > influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is > > NOT a politician". > > > This means two things: > > > 1) That he is a liar. > > > 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who > > would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for > > their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". > > > I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago? > > -- > Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to > have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Styx? Mel Torme'? Chaka Khan? Ramsey Lewis? :)
From: miso on 28 Apr 2010 23:24 On Apr 28, 3:41 pm, "k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:51 -0700 (PDT), "m...(a)sushi.com" <m...(a)sushi.com> > wrote: > > >On Apr 28, 12:16 pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: > >> I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns. > >> It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate > >> for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by > >> the passing of Jack Murtha. > > >>http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/ > > >> "We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate > >> through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January." > > >> Mike > > >Ah yes, like the Scott Brown that screwed over the tea baggers.Useless > >idiots! > > No, *you* are the idiot. One assumes you are not a student of history and don't understand the phrase useless idiots. I hope he used a lot of KY while screwing you. ----------------------------------- http://www.examiner.com/x-2398-Boston-Top-News-Examiner~y2010m4d12-Scott-Brown-disses-Palins-Boston-Tea-Party Brown hitched his wagon to the Tea Party to get himself elected, but he simultaneously distanced himself from the group as the special election to replace Ted Kennedy neared. As Talking Points Memo and the Boston Globe reported back in January, Brown brushed off questions from a Globe reporter about Tea Party activists and groups. Upon assuming office in February, Brown immediately shifted to a moderate stance and broke the vaunted GOP filibuster his election was supposed to ensure by voting for a Democratic sponsored jobs bill.
From: miso on 28 Apr 2010 23:26 On Apr 28, 7:00 pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: > <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message > > news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... > > > > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 > > <ignoramus22...(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: > > >>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > > Really?! > > >>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of > >>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is > >>NOT a politician". > > > Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! > > >>This means two things: > > >>1) That he is a liar. > > > You should know all about it, being a liar. > > >>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who > >>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for > >>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". > > >>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > > Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). > > Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. > The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a > speaker Pelosi. > Mike Do you know how many seats the GOP would have to get to kick out Pelosi? Time to stop breathing all that solder flux.
From: krw on 28 Apr 2010 23:47
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:26:29 -0700 (PDT), "miso(a)sushi.com" <miso(a)sushi.com> wrote: >On Apr 28, 7:00�pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: >> <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message >> >> news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... >> >> >> >> > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 >> > <ignoramus22...(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: >> >> >>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. >> >> > Really?! >> >> >>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >> >>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >> >>NOT a politician". >> >> > Wow! �You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! >> >> >>This means two things: >> >> >>1) That he is a liar. >> >> > You should know all about it, being a liar. >> >> >>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >> >>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >> >>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". >> >> >>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. >> >> > Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). >> >> � Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. >> The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a >> speaker Pelosi. >> � � � � � � � � � Mike > >Do you know how many seats the GOP would have to get to kick out >Pelosi? Time to stop breathing all that solder flux. It's you who has sucked too much lead. |