Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
Next: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
From: sctvguy1 on 29 Apr 2010 10:59 Michael A. Terrell wrote: > Al Capone He was from Brooklyn.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 29 Apr 2010 18:02 sctvguy1 wrote: > > Michael A. Terrell wrote: > > > Al Capone > He was from Brooklyn. <http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/gangsters_outlaws/mob_bosses/capone/index_1.html> -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: dagmargoodboat on 29 Apr 2010 18:03 On Apr 28, 10:12 pm, Ignoramus22435 <ignoramus22...(a)NOSPAM. 22435.invalid> wrote: > On 2010-04-29, amdx <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: > > > > > > ><k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message > >news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... > >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 > >> <ignoramus22...(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: > > >>>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > >> Really?! > > >>>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of > >>>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is > >>>NOT a politician". > > >> Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! > > >>>This means two things: > > >>>1) That he is a liar. > > >> You should know all about it, being a liar. > > >>>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who > >>>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for > >>>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". > > >>>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > >> Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). > > > Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. > > The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a > > speaker Pelosi. > > I used to vote Republican, but, unfortunately, the Republican party > has greatly decayed morally. This "I am NOT a politician" politician > is a good example. I would like to see the Republican party reborn as > an honest, intellectual, and enlightened organization. There's a move afoot to do exactly that, by people who call themselves "conservatives." "Conservative" here though, is really what was classically called "liberal"--one who is prudent (not prudish) and thoughtful; avoiding excessive risk; conserving, as in responsibly husbanding resources, not wasting or wasteful; fiscally responsible; motivated to improve the human condition for all, and so forth. You know, like a conservative design--something built solid, with margins of safety. The Tea Party seeks to encourage statesmen who vow to be faithful to the principles of smaller government, more liberty, and to the Constitution. It's a beautiful thing. -- Cheers, James Arthur
From: krw on 29 Apr 2010 19:24 On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:58:30 -0700 (PDT), "miso(a)sushi.com" <miso(a)sushi.com> wrote: >On Apr 28, 8:47�pm, "k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:26:29 -0700 (PDT), "m...(a)sushi.com" <m...(a)sushi.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Apr 28, 7:00�pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: >> >> <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message >> >> >>news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... >> >> >> > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 >> >> > <ignoramus22...(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> >>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. >> >> >> > Really?! >> >> >> >>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >> >> >>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >> >> >>NOT a politician". >> >> >> > Wow! �You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! >> >> >> >>This means two things: >> >> >> >>1) That he is a liar. >> >> >> > You should know all about it, being a liar. >> >> >> >>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >> >> >>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >> >> >>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". >> >> >> >>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. >> >> >> > Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). >> >> >> � Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. >> >> The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a >> >> speaker Pelosi. >> >> � � � � � � � � � Mike >> >> >Do you know how many seats the GOP would have to get to kick out >> >Pelosi? Time to stop breathing all that solder flux. >> >> It's you who has sucked too much lead. > >You really can't think of a good reply, can you. Admit it. The Tea >Party is being used by the GOP. You really are an idiot. Slowman class.
From: krw on 29 Apr 2010 19:25
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:15:18 -0700 (PDT), Glenn Gundlach <stratus46(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Apr 28, 8:26�pm, "m...(a)sushi.com" <m...(a)sushi.com> wrote: >> On Apr 28, 7:00�pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message >> >> >news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... >> >> > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 >> > > <ignoramus22...(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: >> >> > >>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. >> >> > > Really?! >> >> > >>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of >> > >>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is >> > >>NOT a politician". >> >> > > Wow! �You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! >> >> > >>This means two things: >> >> > >>1) That he is a liar. >> >> > > You should know all about it, being a liar. >> >> > >>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who >> > >>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for >> > >>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". >> >> > >>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. >> >> > > Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). >> >> > � Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. >> > The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a >> > speaker Pelosi. >> > � � � � � � � � � Mike >> > > Do you know how many seats the GOP would have to get to kick out > > Pelosi? Time to stop breathing all that solder flux. > >Willing to put a bet on Dems losing the house? I am. I'll take odds on the Senate, too. |