Help put a Republican in Murtha's Seat
in [Design]
|
Prev: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
Next: Blew the fuse in my multimeter, wanted to replace it, grabbed it, but
From: krw on 28 Apr 2010 23:49 On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:24:53 -0700 (PDT), "miso(a)sushi.com" <miso(a)sushi.com> wrote: >On Apr 28, 3:41�pm, "k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:51 -0700 (PDT), "m...(a)sushi.com" <m...(a)sushi.com> >> wrote: >> >> >On Apr 28, 12:16�pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: >> >> �I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns. >> >> It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate >> >> for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by >> >> the passing of Jack Murtha. >> >> >>http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/ >> >> >> "We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate >> >> through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January." >> >> >> � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Mike >> >> >Ah yes, like the Scott Brown that screwed over the tea baggers.Useless >> >idiots! >> >> No, *you* are the idiot. > >One assumes you are not a student of history and don't understand the >phrase useless idiots. No, dummy. The useless idiots are the commies, like you, following your messiah to your end. Drink the kool-aid, before November. >I hope he used a lot of KY while screwing you. >----------------------------------- >http://www.examiner.com/x-2398-Boston-Top-News-Examiner~y2010m4d12-Scott-Brown-disses-Palins-Boston-Tea-Party > >Brown hitched his wagon to the Tea Party to get himself elected, but >he simultaneously distanced himself from the group as the special >election to replace Ted Kennedy neared. As Talking Points Memo and the >Boston Globe reported back in January, Brown brushed off questions >from a Globe reporter about Tea Party activists and groups. Your point? He is from TaxYourTwoShits. >Upon assuming office in February, Brown immediately shifted to a >moderate stance and broke the vaunted GOP filibuster his election was >supposed to ensure by voting for a Democratic sponsored jobs bill. Keep dreaming, comrade.
From: miso on 28 Apr 2010 23:58 On Apr 28, 8:47 pm, "k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:26:29 -0700 (PDT), "m...(a)sushi.com" <m...(a)sushi.com> > wrote: > > > > >On Apr 28, 7:00 pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: > >> <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message > > >>news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... > > >> > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 > >> > <ignoramus22...(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: > > >> >>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > >> > Really?! > > >> >>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of > >> >>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is > >> >>NOT a politician". > > >> > Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! > > >> >>This means two things: > > >> >>1) That he is a liar. > > >> > You should know all about it, being a liar. > > >> >>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who > >> >>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for > >> >>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". > > >> >>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > >> > Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). > > >> Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. > >> The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a > >> speaker Pelosi. > >> Mike > > >Do you know how many seats the GOP would have to get to kick out > >Pelosi? Time to stop breathing all that solder flux. > > It's you who has sucked too much lead. You really can't think of a good reply, can you. Admit it. The Tea Party is being used by the GOP.
From: Billy on 29 Apr 2010 00:42 In article <d3f82$4bd8896d$18ec6dd7$5981(a)KNOLOGY.NET>, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote: > I just contributed $100.00 to help Tim Burns. > It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate > for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by > the passing of Jack Murtha. > > http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/ > > "We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate > through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January." > > Mike Why not a real man, a Tea Bagger? -- - Billy "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html
From: Glenn Gundlach on 29 Apr 2010 01:15 On Apr 28, 8:26 pm, "m...(a)sushi.com" <m...(a)sushi.com> wrote: > On Apr 28, 7:00 pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: > > > > > > > <k...(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message > > >news:ikkht51f3i7lhuvuehj7i4ar8nqnhpj65s(a)4ax.com... > > > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435 > > > <ignoramus22...(a)NOSPAM.22435.invalid> wrote: > > > >>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > > > Really?! > > > >>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of > > >>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is > > >>NOT a politician". > > > > Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious! > > > >>This means two things: > > > >>1) That he is a liar. > > > > You should know all about it, being a liar. > > > >>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who > > >>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for > > >>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". > > > >>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > > > Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high). > > > Ah, don't pick on iggy he's ok. > > The point is we need to get conservatives elected or we will still have a > > speaker Pelosi. > > Mike > > Do you know how many seats the GOP would have to get to kick out > Pelosi? Time to stop breathing all that solder flux. Willing to put a bet on Dems losing the house? G²
From: Michael A. Terrell on 29 Apr 2010 01:16
mpm wrote: > > On Apr 28, 8:13 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...(a)earthlink.net> > wrote: > > Ignoramus22435 wrote: > > > > > The Republican candidate is Tim Burns. > > > > > He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of > > > influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is > > > NOT a politician". > > > > > This means two things: > > > > > 1) That he is a liar. > > > > > 2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who > > > would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for > > > their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician". > > > > > I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar. > > > > We are supposed to listen to anyone from Chicago? > > > > -- > > Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to > > have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Styx? > Mel Torme'? > Chaka Khan? > Ramsey Lewis? :) Al Capone Barack Obama :( -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge. |