From: Happy Oyster on
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:22:42 -0500, "BillW50" <BillW50(a)aol.kom> wrote:

>In news:b8jab554p21d8ou81sb63mmahr1npc2v93(a)4ax.com,
>Happy Oyster typed on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:49:38 +0200:
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:27:44 -0400, Ben Myers <ben_myers(a)charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure why one would need to fight a Windows install problem if it
>>> had to do with existing partitions.
>>
>> One of the problems is that XP rapes the first partition.
>
>It only changes the first active partition. That could be one of four
>partitions and it doesn't have to be the first one (with Vista and
>Windows 7, it is zillions of partitions). And any Linux partition using
>ext2/3, Windows won't touch it. Aribert doesn't even know this.
>Otherwise he wouldn't be experiencing any of this.

I don't give a damn about which type of partitions IN SPECIAL XP can handle. I
chose a very strange one because I did not want to have to try again.

Also, I do not discuss with XP. I roast it.


>> I had to
>> use a Linux DVD to boot and to change the first partition to be of
>> some off Unix type. THIS XP did not touch and in the first run of the
>> installation copied its stuff to the second partition where it has to
>> be. Making the first partition invisible does not work as then XP
>> thinks it is in the first and messes up its boot record THE WRONG WAY.
>>
>> First step:
>>
>> To handle the HDD (has serial ATA) partition the HDD and format the
>> partitions with Linux. THAT WORKS.
>>
>>
>> Second step:
>>
>> Change the type of those partitions XP has to keep its fingers off to
>> some wierd Unix type.
>>
>>
>> Third step:
>>
>> As XP is damned stupid, IF you also want a Linux on the machine,
>> install that as the first OS. THEN install Win XP. This way you can
>> start (with the help of a boot CD/DVD (like Super-GRUB) into a
>> working system to check the other partitions, etc.
>>
>>
>> Fourth step:
>>
>> XP will mess up the MBR, so with the Linux DVD to boot, use GRUB and
>> get the MBR stuff back to order.
>>
>> BUT to get that right, the partition types of "wierd Unix" must be
>> set back to the right values BEFORE you can work on GRUB.
>>
>> If you messed up something, then a complete Linux installation will
>> be the last step.
>>
>>
>> Problems of the XP installer are that it messes up with partitions,
>> reboot, etc.
>>
>> To get around this, use a Super-GRUB CD and for doing the second part
>> of the XP install (which is from HDD): use the CD to boot from the
>> Win XP partition.
>>
>> This works with serial ATA.
>>
>>
>> There are TWO CDs which accompany the netbooks. One is the "recovery
>> CD" with the pure OS (in a miserable state), the other is for the
>> additions, drivers, etc. That one must be installed after XP is
>> installed.
>>
>> I called a LG tech suppport because I feared that the OS CD already
>> contains some special stuff for the machine. But I was told that I
>> could use a totally neutral XP installation CD because all the
>> specific stuff is on the second CD.
>>
>> Without the second CD, I'm afraid, one doesn't get very far: It
>> contains the drivers for the chipsets and without these the machine
>> is cut off even from the basic hardware...
>
>And if you boot up Ubuntu Live and not even touching the hard drive at
>all, Ubuntu modifies your Windows partition (happened to me three times
>and to somebody else). And when you install Linux after Windows it
>screws up your Windows installation.
>
>But what Aribert won't tell you is that UNIX/Linux isn't very useful at
>all. Nor is the security very good at all. Rootkits came out first from
>the Unix/Linux world and not from the Windows world (by about 15 years).
>Some distros doesn't even have a firewall. And Linux doesn't have a
>100th of the applications that Windows has. No, Aribert won't tell you
>any of this stuff. Why? Because he is afraid too. <grin>
--
The big "gmt"-scam

http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_gmt1.htm
From: BillW50 on
In news:lutab5t3t2e4vl7b9aahfpo5hqe4ktc462(a)4ax.com,
Happy Oyster typed on Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:33:27 +0200:
> I don't give a damn about which type of partitions IN SPECIAL XP can
> handle. I chose a very strange one because I did not want to have to
> try again.
>
> Also, I do not discuss with XP. I roast it.

Yes we know Aribert! And I *only* had known you for a little over a
decade. <vbg>

--
Bill
Windows 2000 SP4 (5.00.2195)
Asus EEE PC 701G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC


From: Ben Myers on
Happy Oyster wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:27:44 -0400, Ben Myers <ben_myers(a)charter.net> wrote:
>
>> Not sure why one would need to fight a Windows install problem if it had
>> to do with existing partitions.
>
> One of the problems is that XP rapes the first partition. I had to use a Linux
> DVD to boot and to change the first partition to be of some off Unix type. THIS
> XP did not touch and in the first run of the installation copied its stuff to
> the second partition where it has to be. Making the first partition invisible
> does not work as then XP thinks it is in the first and messes up its boot record
> THE WRONG WAY.
>
> First step:
>
> To handle the HDD (has serial ATA) partition the HDD and format the partitions
> with Linux. THAT WORKS.
>
>
> Second step:
>
> Change the type of those partitions XP has to keep its fingers off to some wierd
> Unix type.
>
>
> Third step:
>
> As XP is damned stupid, IF you also want a Linux on the machine, install that as
> the first OS. THEN install Win XP. This way you can start (with the help of a
> boot CD/DVD (like Super-GRUB) into a working system to check the other
> partitions, etc.
>
>
> Fourth step:
>
> XP will mess up the MBR, so with the Linux DVD to boot, use GRUB and get the MBR
> stuff back to order.
>
> BUT to get that right, the partition types of "wierd Unix" must be set back to
> the right values BEFORE you can work on GRUB.
>
> If you messed up something, then a complete Linux installation will be the last
> step.
>
>
> Problems of the XP installer are that it messes up with partitions, reboot, etc.
>
> To get around this, use a Super-GRUB CD and for doing the second part of the XP
> install (which is from HDD): use the CD to boot from the Win XP partition.
>
> This works with serial ATA.
>
>
> There are TWO CDs which accompany the netbooks. One is the "recovery CD" with
> the pure OS (in a miserable state), the other is for the additions, drivers,
> etc. That one must be installed after XP is installed.
>
> I called a LG tech suppport because I feared that the OS CD already contains
> some special stuff for the machine. But I was told that I could use a totally
> neutral XP installation CD because all the specific stuff is on the second CD.
>
> Without the second CD, I'm afraid, one doesn't get very far: It contains the
> drivers for the chipsets and without these the machine is cut off even from the
> basic hardware...
>
> Aribert Deckers


There is a really simple solution to a Windows-Linux dual boot problem.
Two hard drives... Ben Myers
From: Ben Myers on
BillW50 wrote:
> In news:h93me1$an5$1(a)news.eternal-september.org,
> Barry Watzman typed on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:36:47 -0400:
>> ... but it requires a
>> floppy disk drive, and absent BIOS emulation support (which most
>> modern motherboards and laptops do have, but which older ones don't)
>> the floppy disk has to be "real" and not USB (again, most modern
>> systems, however, do support USB emulation, and, also in many cases,
>> SATA emulation)...
>
> Just to be clear... virtually all modern day BIOS *will* totally accept
> USB floppy drives as *real* floppy drives. Same is true of USB hard
> drives and optical drives as well. That doesn't mean the OS will though.
> As that is totally different.
>
Well, if the motherboard BIOS masks from the OS the fact that a drive is
USB, the OS won't know, won't care, and will go blithely ahead and use
it like any other drive. Of course, there is no standard for a
motherboard BIOS, and Micro$oft may have something written into its OEM
contracts to actually prohibit a BIOS smarter than it is... Ben Myers
From: Ben Myers on
Happy Oyster wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:22:42 -0500, "BillW50" <BillW50(a)aol.kom> wrote:
>
>> In news:b8jab554p21d8ou81sb63mmahr1npc2v93(a)4ax.com,
>> Happy Oyster typed on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:49:38 +0200:
>>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:27:44 -0400, Ben Myers <ben_myers(a)charter.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not sure why one would need to fight a Windows install problem if it
>>>> had to do with existing partitions.
>>> One of the problems is that XP rapes the first partition.
>> It only changes the first active partition. That could be one of four
>> partitions and it doesn't have to be the first one (with Vista and
>> Windows 7, it is zillions of partitions). And any Linux partition using
>> ext2/3, Windows won't touch it. Aribert doesn't even know this.
>> Otherwise he wouldn't be experiencing any of this.
>
> I don't give a damn about which type of partitions IN SPECIAL XP can handle. I
> chose a very strange one because I did not want to have to try again.
>
> Also, I do not discuss with XP. I roast it.
>
>
>>> I had to
>>> use a Linux DVD to boot and to change the first partition to be of
>>> some off Unix type. THIS XP did not touch and in the first run of the
>>> installation copied its stuff to the second partition where it has to
>>> be. Making the first partition invisible does not work as then XP
>>> thinks it is in the first and messes up its boot record THE WRONG WAY.
>>>
>>> First step:
>>>
>>> To handle the HDD (has serial ATA) partition the HDD and format the
>>> partitions with Linux. THAT WORKS.
>>>
>>>
>>> Second step:
>>>
>>> Change the type of those partitions XP has to keep its fingers off to
>>> some wierd Unix type.
>>>
>>>
>>> Third step:
>>>
>>> As XP is damned stupid, IF you also want a Linux on the machine,
>>> install that as the first OS. THEN install Win XP. This way you can
>>> start (with the help of a boot CD/DVD (like Super-GRUB) into a
>>> working system to check the other partitions, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Fourth step:
>>>
>>> XP will mess up the MBR, so with the Linux DVD to boot, use GRUB and
>>> get the MBR stuff back to order.
>>>
>>> BUT to get that right, the partition types of "wierd Unix" must be
>>> set back to the right values BEFORE you can work on GRUB.
>>>
>>> If you messed up something, then a complete Linux installation will
>>> be the last step.
>>>
>>>
>>> Problems of the XP installer are that it messes up with partitions,
>>> reboot, etc.
>>>
>>> To get around this, use a Super-GRUB CD and for doing the second part
>>> of the XP install (which is from HDD): use the CD to boot from the
>>> Win XP partition.
>>>
>>> This works with serial ATA.
>>>
>>>
>>> There are TWO CDs which accompany the netbooks. One is the "recovery
>>> CD" with the pure OS (in a miserable state), the other is for the
>>> additions, drivers, etc. That one must be installed after XP is
>>> installed.
>>>
>>> I called a LG tech suppport because I feared that the OS CD already
>>> contains some special stuff for the machine. But I was told that I
>>> could use a totally neutral XP installation CD because all the
>>> specific stuff is on the second CD.
>>>
>>> Without the second CD, I'm afraid, one doesn't get very far: It
>>> contains the drivers for the chipsets and without these the machine
>>> is cut off even from the basic hardware...
>> And if you boot up Ubuntu Live and not even touching the hard drive at
>> all, Ubuntu modifies your Windows partition (happened to me three times
>> and to somebody else). And when you install Linux after Windows it
>> screws up your Windows installation.
>>
>> But what Aribert won't tell you is that UNIX/Linux isn't very useful at
>> all. Nor is the security very good at all. Rootkits came out first from
>> the Unix/Linux world and not from the Windows world (by about 15 years).
>> Some distros doesn't even have a firewall. And Linux doesn't have a
>> 100th of the applications that Windows has. No, Aribert won't tell you
>> any of this stuff. Why? Because he is afraid too. <grin>

If XP is that bad for you, why do you even use it at all? ... Ben Myers