From: JoeBloe on
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:08:52 -0000, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

>So what?

FOAD
From: YD on
Late at night, by candle light, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith)
penned this immortal opus:

>In article <1ac67$4554024d$4fe76f5$27303(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>,
>unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote:
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>> In article <f4p7l21a400mq09lf26tcq86s8gkv3q479(a)4ax.com>,
>>> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)nosuchplace.org> wrote:
>>> [....]
>>>
>>>> Name a foreign part in the M1 Abrams.
>>>
>>>
>>> Q401
>>>
>>> That was easy.
>>>
>>>
>>Silliness, goofy behavior, excitability, inappropriate
>>humor ... the first signs of bipolar disorder.
>
>Yes, I think you may be right. You should see a doctor, I hear that have
>drugs for it these days.
>
>BTW: Those in the sci.electronics.design group will have understood the
>joke more thoroughly than others. For those: Q401 would be a transistor
>and it is very unlikely that there are no transistors in the M1 that are
>made outside the country.
>
>

Very likely many of them are bipolar.

- YD.

--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.
From: T Wake on

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45553913.BDA8D03F(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
> T Wake wrote:
>
>> I am not sure what Unsettled thinks he is gaining here. My original post
>> did
>> say "Any AD radar activations within the NFZ were followed up by strikes
>> as
>> were any AD radar which was suspected of painting Coalition aircraft" -
>> so I
>> don't know why he thinks I am trying to hide the "threat" nature of an
>> Air
>> Defence system.
>
> I suspect he's inferring that your use of the word 'paint' as opposed to
> 'illuminate' was a politically inspired choice.

Oh right. Odd. But then so is he....


From: T Wake on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:l9gal2p6hiopo85rh4uatu5p78kj5q5ntr(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:08:52 -0000, "T Wake"
> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:
>
>>So what?
>
> FOAD

Aww. Is your newsreader broken? This is the bit you seem to have missed: (as
you can see, the so what remains valid). There are still foreign parts in
the M1 - no matter how much you try to call the countries which manufacture
them American.

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:g1eal2dosisofr40ccnm98kcgi8pbtiar0(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:22:55 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net
> (Ken Smith) Gave us:
>
>>In article <1ac67$4554024d$4fe76f5$27303(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>,
>>unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <f4p7l21a400mq09lf26tcq86s8gkv3q479(a)4ax.com>,
>>>> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)nosuchplace.org> wrote:
>>>> [....]
>>>>
>>>>> Name a foreign part in the M1 Abrams.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Q401
>>>>
>>>> That was easy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Silliness, goofy behavior, excitability, inappropriate
>>>humor ... the first signs of bipolar disorder.
>>
>>Yes, I think you may be right. You should see a doctor, I hear that have
>>drugs for it these days.
>>
>>BTW: Those in the sci.electronics.design group will have understood the
>>joke more thoroughly than others. For those: Q401 would be a transistor
>>and it is very unlikely that there are no transistors in the M1 that are
>>made outside the country.
>>
>
> A transistor is a discreet component. A complete circuit card
> assembly would be more like "a part".
>
> Everyone knows that chips and such are made in other lands. That
> doesn't make them not ours however.
>
> Even Western Digital has its products made and assembled elsewhere,
> but it is still an American company.


From: unsettled on
T Wake wrote:

> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:5R75h.319$yE6.124(a)newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...

>>By the way, I thought you were going to ignore what I was saying. Still
>>haven't figured out what "PLONK" means? Please feel free to.

> He is from the George Hammond School of logic I suspect.

PLONK is the sound made when an identity drops into the
bozo bin called a killfile. Simply means I stop reading
and responding to posts from Lucas just as I did with
the donkey.

The filters aren't good enough to eliminate him from
sequential replies by others, where I have no
hesitation at all in discussing his pathological
ideation when something rises to a level worthy of
comment, as most of his stuff does not.

So it seems that Lucas is the one who hasn't figured
out what PONK means in real terms. But not understanding
what he's talking about never stopped him anyway.