From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Raising the minimum wage is stupid and insane.
> >> >
> >> >Why ?
> >>
> >> It causes all other prices to eventually go up, especially housing.
> >> It eliminates wage competition. People's real productivity is
> >> no longer measured nor rewarded with wage.
> >>
> >>
> >> >I saw it can be a slow as $5 an hour.
> >> >
> >> >Can anyone actually live on that ?
> >>
> >> $10k/year? Yes.
> >
> >You wouldn't get far on ?5263 over here for sure.
>
> I didn't say it was easy and one also has to give up a lot
> of middle class "attitudes" ;-).

Around here you'd pay ~ ?3000 p.a. minimum just for a very basic rented room !

Now try living on ?43 p.w. !

Graham

From: unsettled on
Ken Smith wrote:

> In article <sq15h.3588$IR4.1362(a)newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>,
> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> [....]
>
>>I would argue that anybody who is still making minimum wage after any time
>>at all in a job, isn't productive and doesn't deserve to be rewarded.
>
>
> There are some who are working at the limit of their ability. These
> people still deserve enough of a wage to live on. I have, indirectly,
> employed such a person in the past. He showed up for work on time and
> remained for the required time, but instructions to him needed to be made
> without subordinate clauses because he could not parse them. He is never
> going to get promoted into management no matter how hard he works.

Eeyore works for you?


From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >krw wrote:
> >> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says...
> >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Raising the minimum wage is stupid and insane.
> >> >
> >> > Why ?
> >>
> >> Why should the federal government tell anyone what their worth is?
> >> >
> >> > I saw it can be a slow as $5 an hour.
> >>
> >> The federal minimum wage is $5.15/hr. Some states are higher
> >> (Vermont is $7.25 and going up). I'm not sure anyone really works
> >> for the minimum (MacD's is advertising $9.00/hr.).
> >
> >So why the fuss over increasing what would seem to be a notional minimum ?
> >
>
> You should notice that Keith is swearing. That is not is usual
> style. I guess he's got the same problems I have. AS minimum
> wage goes skyhigh, so do property taxes, real estate, food, other
> taxes, and other things needed for survival.

I don't recall anyone suggesting that the minimum wage was going 'sky high'.

Long before a minimum wage of ~ $10 equivalent was introduced here, property
prices were increasing crazily anyway.

I never noticed any influence on food ot taxes.

Graham

From: T Wake on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:4krbl29h7imp8vc91vrkss29r591e1lbtn(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:39:29 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us:
>
>>
>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
>>news:g1eal2dosisofr40ccnm98kcgi8pbtiar0(a)4ax.com...
>>>
>>> Even Western Digital has its products made and assembled elsewhere,
>>> but it is still an American company.
>>
>>...and what fraction of their workforce would be American?
>>
>>Eric Lucas
>>
>
>
> The up front investiture, hardware product, the profits, the name,
> the quality assurance, the engineering... All the parts that matter.

How is that a fraction of the workforce? Do you mean to imply that the
workers don't matter?


From: T Wake on

<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:ej4hah$8ss_014(a)s977.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
> In article <45537045.AC5FCFC6(a)hotmail.com>,
> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote:
>>
>>> Something approaching 20% of the people in our country can't afford any
> sort
>>> of health care. To say that "ain't broke" is one of the most morally
> bereft
>>> statements I've heard in a very, very long time. Congratulations,
>>> you've
>>> demonstrated the lack of a conscience along with a lack of a brain.
>>
>>BAH may not be aware that it was a social conscience that drove Britain to
> look
>>at the possibility of a National Health Service.
>
> Britain is a single country and has a "small" acreage. The US
> is 50 "countries" span a quarter hemisphere.

So what?

>>
>>A society that condemns its less well-off members to poor / inadequate
>>health
>>provision is no great example to anyone.
>>
>>Heck, there's an American chap I chat with on MSN who simply couldn't
>>afford
> to
>>buy the best medicine for his wife's condition.
>
> You should have examined the situation a tad more closely.

Blimey, another irony meter bites the big one.

> Was
> he able to get the good medicine or was he forced to take the
> generic? Did he expect to pay $12 for the best? I've run
> into this attitude before and people simply don't want to
> buy drugs without a massive discount. I don't understnad this
> mindset yet.

See, an NHS would solve that mindset.