From: jmfbahciv on
In article <45575367.44AE6885(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> Ben Newsam <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>> >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> My folks,
>> >>> who will not see 80 again, dug a dry well by hand in the
>> >>> summer of 2005.
>> >>
>> >>Dare I ask why ?
>> >
>> >I think we would call that a "sink" rather than a "well", or possibly
>> >a "soakaway".
>>
>> Oh, dear. Have I just tripped over another word that doesnt'
>> tranlate into English? :-)
>>
>> If I had to guess, I would say that your soakaway is our leach field.
>
>It sounds like it.
>
>Soakaways are common here to for rainwater especially.

I can see using those for grey water, but not black water.
Grey water is our lingo for water that is used for showers,
clothes and dish washing. Black water is the volumes that
have sewerage in it.

/BAH
From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> What is really happening
> >>>> is that people, who do not have access to a GP, go to the
> >>>> most expensive health care facility for treatment.
> >>>
> >>>Why would they do that ?
> >>
> >> To get drugs to fix their problem. Doctors don't take
> >> new patients who are already sick even if one has
> >> medical insurance.
> >
> >Where did you get that loony idea?
>
> Personal experience. I know that doesn't matter to you. I
> need a web site that proves my experience never happened before
> you'll give any credence to what I write.

What does a website prove ?

Anyway, I thought you said you didn't 'do' the Internet ?

You can take it from me that this doesn't happen in the UK. You are *entitled*
to a doctor and treatment no matter how bad your health may be.

Graham

From: Ben Newsam on
On Mon, 13 Nov 06 11:05:54 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

>In article <QNU5h.124471$3x1.92893(a)fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
> "Sorcerer" <Headmaster(a)hogwarts.physics_e> wrote:
>>
>>"Ben Newsam" <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:n1ifl29hhnqark8djruc1ga4u3p3b0p37n(a)4ax.com...
>>
>>
>
>Oh, my! The child has learned a new trick. How many decades
>will take for you to grow out of the terrible-twos?

I suggest you just plonk him like I now have. That way you don't have
to see his childish nonsense.
From: Ben Newsam on
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:19:07 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>Ben Newsam wrote:
>> <Looks at computer clock> 9:45
>>
>> Looks OK to me
>
>Do you 'batch post' then ?

Sometimes a post might not "go" until later, but no I don't post in
batches. That reply of mine at 9:45 included the header:

Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:45:53 +0000

so I don't think there's a problem. Not this end, anyway.
From: Ben Newsam on
On Mon, 13 Nov 06 10:52:35 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

>In article <9offl211jg34dcjnvbklqkeetfaa686dq1(a)4ax.com>,
> Ben Newsam <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>>On Sun, 12 Nov 06 14:00:10 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>>>In article <455638E2.B76D8B7A(a)hotmail.com>,
>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>I'm wondering if BAH thinks we have our treatment 'rationed'.
>>>
>>>Would you know if that happened? Since you can't "shop around"
>>>and compare, you cannot find out if your treatment is rationed,
>>>especially its efficacy.
>>
>>All health systems of whatever sort are limited by cost. An
>>insurance-based scheme will give up long before the NHS, however.
>
>That is one of the reasons an NHS doesn't work well. It takes
>a long time to figure out that something isn't working and then
>decades to adjust policies that will fix it. Meanwhile the
>original problem has been replaced with new problems. None
>ever get fixed because the lag time is so long.

What I meant was that an insurance-based system will refuse to treat
people who it considers are not insured sooner than one which does not
depend on insurance. That means that, should you need a heart
transplant, for instance, the only reason you might not get one (other
than medical reasons) is because of the limits of the system, not
because of your lack of adequate premiums.