From: Eeyore on


Ben Newsam wrote:

> ISTR that each GP's list
> may have about 10,000 patients, but I don't know the actual number.

You're way over the right figure there Ben. 2,000 is around average.

Graham

From: John Fields on
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:30:37 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
>"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message
>news:a94e9$45565e88$4fe73d4$10122(a)DIALUPUSA.NET...
>>T Wake wrote:
>>
>>> "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
>>> news:vq9cl2dvd1icib3l1k30fv47kpdpevn2i8(a)4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:45:06 -0000, "T Wake"
>>>><usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
>>>>>news:4krbl29h7imp8vc91vrkss29r591e1lbtn(a)4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:39:29 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:g1eal2dosisofr40ccnm98kcgi8pbtiar0(a)4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even Western Digital has its products made and assembled elsewhere,
>>>>>>>>but it is still an American company.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>...and what fraction of their workforce would be American?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Eric Lucas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The up front investiture, hardware product, the profits, the name,
>>>>>>the quality assurance, the engineering... All the parts that matter.
>>>>>
>>>>>How is that a fraction of the workforce? Do you mean to imply that the
>>>>>workers don't matter?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I knew I could count on a twit like you not to get it.
>>>
>>>
>>> It's ok. I know you cant explain yourself properly. Your educational
>>> difficulties are pretty apparent.
>>>
>>> Feel free to explain what you meant by responding to "and what fraction
>>> of their workforce would be American?" with "The up front investiture,
>>> hardware product, the profits, the name, the quality assurance, the
>>> engineering... All the parts that matter."
>>>
>>> I am sure it will be as entertaining as the rest of your posts.
>>
>>
>> His point was valid in as much as you've shifted the
>> goalposts because you were losing the argument.
>>
>> Your new question might be valid if asked in isolation
>> from the discussion which was at hand.
>>
>> First concede that American products, designed by
>> Americans and/or legal aliens in American employ,
>> are sometimes manufactured by non-American hands
>> operating American designed machines in Pacific
>> Rim nations. After that we can discuss your newer
>> query.
>
>
>Well, actually, since my question was asked first, perhaps you might want to
>hold JoeBlows to the same standard of answering the question before moving
>on, that you do TWake. Oh, that's right, you only demand those questions be
>answered that support your point of view....

---
Very nicely insightful. :-)

He also requires that the questions be answered in ways of which he
approves so that he can be the ultimate arbiter of the validity of
the answers.

--
JF
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <Hw06h.5436$IR4.3256(a)newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>,
<lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>news:ej9pdm$8qk_004(a)s785.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>> In article <luM5h.3942$Sw1.2732(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:

<snip>

>>> Ever wonder why most (all?) water
>>>treatment plants are adjacent to either a river, lake, or some other large
>>>body of water?
>>
>> No.
>
>Well, that would be your problem, then.

Not at all. I didn't have to question why because I knew why.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <eja0cc$9nk$1(a)blue.rahul.net>,
kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote:
>In article <ej9pql$8qk_007(a)s785.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>In article <4557506C.83F6D696(a)earthlink.net>,
>[....]
>>> A tap is for threading holes.
>>
>>What? Explain, please?
>
>The tool for threading (cutting threads on the inside surface of) a hole
>is called a "rap". Imagine a threaded bolt with 4 grooves cut along its
>length adn a square head. It is made from very hard metal. You drill a
>hole and then run the tap in. The it is held by a tee-handle. You turn
>it one turn in and then back a half and so on.

Thanks. I used to thread pipe for my Dad. He never called
it a tap. He called a threader. He had two kinds; one was
easy to use and the other one was a PITA for a little weak
kid to use.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
In article <45586F00.261B7EDA(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>> >> Ben Newsam <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> My folks,
>> >> >>> who will not see 80 again, dug a dry well by hand in the
>> >> >>> summer of 2005.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Dare I ask why ?
>> >> >
>> >> >I think we would call that a "sink" rather than a "well", or possibly
>> >> >a "soakaway".
>> >>
>> >> Oh, dear. Have I just tripped over another word that doesnt'
>> >> tranlate into English? :-)
>> >>
>> >> If I had to guess, I would say that your soakaway is our leach field.
>> >
>> >It sounds like it.
>> >
>> >Soakaways are common here to for rainwater especially.
>>
>> I can see using those for grey water, but not black water.
>> Grey water is our lingo for water that is used for showers,
>> clothes and dish washing. Black water is the volumes that
>> have sewerage in it.
>
>We use those terms too.

OK. I wasn't sure people across the pond used the same terms
and tried to explain. This has been a gold mine of new word
usages.

>
>Some ppl like to recycle their grey water for other uses.

I just let nature figure it out.

/BAH