Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 14 Nov 2006 22:11 Michael A. Terrell wrote: > unsettled wrote: > >>Michael A. Terrell wrote: >> >> >>>unsettled wrote: >>> >>> >>>>They should work for what they're worth rather than >>>>what you think they're worth. >>> >>> >>> >>> Can you live on nothing? >> >>False dilemma. >> >>I earned very well because I was paid what my >>work was worth. > > > > Yet you expect others to live on nothing? We have a number of welfare systems for those whose work is worth nothing, so yes, certainly.
From: lucasea on 14 Nov 2006 22:11 "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message news:MPG.1fc3cb5179e833c9989b43(a)news.individual.net... > > (of course I don't have a phone line, > so...). Well, that latter would be the real issue then, not the distance to a hub. Eric Lucas
From: unsettled on 14 Nov 2006 22:12 Don Bowey wrote: > On 11/14/06 5:14 PM, in article efb49$455a6730$4fe40db$12195(a)DIALUPUSA.NET, > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > > >>Don Bowey wrote: >> >> >>>On 11/14/06 9:53 AM, in article 455A0288.A6D8BAC4(a)hotmail.com, "Eeyore" >>><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>unsettled wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Don Bowey wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>"krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>It must be time to organize workers who are receiving less than decent >>>>>>wages. >>>>> >>>>>Oh goody, yet another Bolshevik movement. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Do you really want to improve your personal condition by cheating people >>>>>>out >>>>>>of a fair share of their country? >>>>> >>>>>They should work for what they're worth rather than >>>>>what you think they're worth. >>>> >>>>What's the *worth* of a human soul ? >>>> >>>>Graham >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>He wouldn't know; he has yet to pay the price of obtaining one. >> >>Gratuitous bullshit. >> >>Work <> human_soul >> > > > He has yet to pay the price of obtaining one. Whatever you say, dearie.
From: unsettled on 14 Nov 2006 22:18 Michael A. Terrell wrote: > unsettled wrote: > >>YD wrote: >> >> >>>So, have the lot of you reached a consensus, does jihad need >>>scientists or not? >>> >>>- YD, just throwing some spanners in the works. >> >>We ned to send them the brits participating in this thread. > > > > Who is ned? s/ned/need/w
From: Michael A. Terrell on 14 Nov 2006 22:21
krw wrote: > > In article <455A00B8.1CF0F40D(a)hotmail.com>, > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > krw wrote: > > > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says... > > > > > > > Thanks. I used to thread pipe for my Dad. He never called > > > > it a tap. He called a threader. > > > > > > A pipe "threader" would be called a "die". > > > > Not if it was an internal thread. > > I've never seen an internal thread on a pipe. Have you? You've never seen a threaded reducer that is a piece of pipe with male & female threads? I've used lots of them to connect 1/2" rigid conduit to cast boxes with 3/4" internal threads. They are hard to see, if properly installed. A picture of the shoulderless version: <http://www.sonsbeek.com.au/product-details.asp?productID=84> A picture of the shouldered version: <http://www.aquamole.com/accessories.html> Also, the 91 series RF probes for the Boonton 92 & 9200 meters use internally threaded pipe to make the adapters for various interfaces. <http://www.mjs-electronics.se/images/Boonton/91_12f.jpg> -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |