From: Ben Newsam on
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:15:43 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
wrote:

>I earned very well because I was paid what my
>work was worth.

The problem is, supposing you weren't? What would you do then?
From: unsettled on
Ben Newsam wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:11:36 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>There's a Marxist-socialist undercurrent in this
>>discussion which seems to want to equate the value
>>of all work and all workers.
>
>
> Only in your own mind and in your posts. Nobody else mentions Marx,
> and nobody else has mentioned equal value of all work or workers.
> Nobody else seems to think it is relevant.

Part and parcel of your doublespeak world. You're so
ignorant you puppet Marxist lines and don't even
realize it. Don't feel bad about it though, there are
plenty of people who think they invented the wheel.
Often they invent a new name for it too!


From: unsettled on
Ben Newsam wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:15:43 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>I earned very well because I was paid what my
>>work was worth.
>
>
> The problem is, supposing you weren't? What would you do then?

It has never been a problem for me. Perhaps it
was your problem?
From: Ben Newsam on
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:39:24 -0800, Don Bowey <dbowey(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>Not satisfactory to whom? Screw them.

OK, I retract. An NHS wouldn't be a good idea in the USA, it's
unimplementable because too high a proportion of them are idiots.
From: Ben Newsam on
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:06:40 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
wrote:
>Ben Newsam wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:11:36 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>There's a Marxist-socialist undercurrent in this
>>>discussion which seems to want to equate the value
>>>of all work and all workers.
>>
>>
>> Only in your own mind and in your posts. Nobody else mentions Marx,
>> and nobody else has mentioned equal value of all work or workers.
>> Nobody else seems to think it is relevant.
>
>Part and parcel of your doublespeak world. You're so
>ignorant you puppet Marxist lines and don't even
>realize it. Don't feel bad about it though, there are
>plenty of people who think they invented the wheel.
>Often they invent a new name for it too!

I am not a Marxist, I am about as far from Marxism as it is possible
to get. I dislike Marxists, I eschew their beliefs. If there were such
a thing as a Marxist Party I would not vote for them, I would not join
them, I would campaign against them. Marx's writings may well have
been relevant (but never interesting) 150 years ago, but not today.
Etc., etc..

Are you totally stupid?