From: lucasea on

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:455A8F61.DC8E0210(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
> Don Bowey wrote:
>
>> "Ben Newsam" <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 14 Nov 06 13:39:12 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> You are still assuming that there exists a GP who takes new patients.
>> >
>> > Yes. Why not? There always should be, as long as the population
>> > doesn't expand unexpectedly.
>> >
>> >> I ask my question again but I'll try to rephrase so that you get it.
>> >>
>> >> If no GPs are taking new patients, what do you do if you are
>> >> legitimately unhappy with the doctor you are assigned to.
>> >
>> > An extremely unlikely scenario. Extremely unlikely. If that were to
>> > happen, then you would obviously have to wait. It's never happened to
>> > me.
>>
>> Then you are fortunate. Incompatibilities between doctors and patients
>> is
>> not rare, and is (without prejudice) grounds for change. There must be
>> good
>> communications originated and accepted by each of them.
>
> I've only ever had any kind of disagreement with a doctor once and she was
> Moslem ! I'll avoid her in future.


Clearly she hated you for your wellness.... :^)

Eric Lucas


From: lucasea on

"krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message
news:MPG.1fc459ba145f0210989b5d(a)news.individual.net...
> In article <Lzv6h.6398$Sw1.5307(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
> lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says...
>>
>> "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.1fc3cb5179e833c9989b43(a)news.individual.net...
>> >
>> > (of course I don't have a phone line,
>> > so...).
>>
>> Well, that latter would be the real issue then, not the distance to a
>> hub.
>
> No, you ditz! I choose not to have a phone line (too expensive),

Actually, the phone company will run a line to your house for free. There's
nothing saying you have to get phone service using the line.

Eric Lucas


From: lucasea on

"krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message
news:MPG.1fc45a6fa4c6d938989b5f(a)news.individual.net...
> In article <wOv6h.6401$Sw1.3659(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
> lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says...
>>
>> "krw" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.1fc3cca0c79bee02989b44(a)news.individual.net...
>> > In article <kgl6h.25069$TV3.20095(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
>> > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says...
>> >>
>> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:4559DA19.3B5B7EC8(a)hotmail.com...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >And you like to imply things that just aren't true. You weren't
>> >> >> >living
>> >> >> >on
>> >> >> >"$2/day".
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Right. It was $2/month.
>> >> >
>> >> > And you can also clean a whole house in 15 mins ?
>> >>
>> >> The thing that she conveniently glosses over is that 1) it was in
>> >> 1960s
>> >> dollars, about a factor of 10 - 100 higher when adjusted for
>> >> inflation,
>> >> and
>> >> 2) she was also paying tuition, room and board, which probably added
>> >> at
>> >> least $50/month in 1960 dollars, or $1000/month in 2006 dollars.
>> >
>> > $50 in 1960 would be equivalent to $316 in 2005.
>>
>> That's only 4% per year for the past 45 years? Seems awfully low.
>
> Good fscking grief! Look the numbers up!

Jezus, I'm not even allowed to have an opinion that a number sounds low? I
wasn't calling your very being into question, I was just expressing an
opinion. Get over yourself!

Eric Lucas


From: Michael A. Terrell on
unsettled wrote:
>
> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>
> > krw wrote:
> >
> >>In article <455A00B8.1CF0F40D(a)hotmail.com>,
> >>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says...
> >>
> >>>
> >>>krw wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Thanks. I used to thread pipe for my Dad. He never called
> >>>>>it a tap. He called a threader.
> >>>>
> >>>>A pipe "threader" would be called a "die".
> >>>
> >>>Not if it was an internal thread.
> >>
> >>I've never seen an internal thread on a pipe. Have you?
> >
> >
> >
> > You've never seen a threaded reducer that is a piece of pipe with male
> > & female threads?
>
> That's not "pipe". That's a bushing.
>
> "A pipe fitting used to join two pipes of different
> sizes. A bushing is threaded inside and out. Also a
> cylindrical part used as a lining or guide"
>
> www.alpha-plumbing.com/plumbing-terminology-b.htm
>
> pipe defined:
>
> "a long, hollow cylinder, usually steel, through
> which fluids are conducted."


Galvanized and Aluminum "Pipe" is also used as conduit for electrical
work, with its own terminology. If you weren't so close minded, you
might learn something. In this case, its "a long, hollow cylinder,
usually steel, through which electrons are conducted.". The reducers
are made from steel pipe, even if you do consider them to be bushings.



> www.fi.edu/fellows/fellow2/jan99/new/oilvocab.html
>
> > I've used lots of them to connect 1/2" rigid conduit
> > to cast boxes with 3/4" internal threads. They are hard to see, if
> > properly installed.
> >
> >
> > A picture of the shoulderless version:
> >
> > <http://www.sonsbeek.com.au/product-details.asp?productID=84>
> >
> >
> > A picture of the shouldered version:
> >
> > <http://www.aquamole.com/accessories.html>
> >
> >
> > Also, the 91 series RF probes for the Boonton 92 & 9200 meters use
> > internally threaded pipe to make the adapters for various interfaces.
> >
> > <http://www.mjs-electronics.se/images/Boonton/91_12f.jpg>
> >
> >


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
From: Michael A. Terrell on
unsettled wrote:
>
> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> > unsettled wrote:
> >
> >>Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>unsettled wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>What's not discussed in this thread is the fact that
> >>>>the manufacturers have been advertising on US TV for
> >>>>some time now that if you can't afford the medicines
> >>>>you need you should contact them because they have
> >>>>programs to assist those living in poverty needing
> >>>>their products.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Have you ever tried to qualify someone for free drugs? Every one
> >>>I've tried to help was denied.
> >>
> >>Were they living in poverty?
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes. Well under $10,000 income per year. One of them finally got
> > her disability and some medical help just in time. She almost lost her
> > feet due to blood clots, and has had to undergo six operations to
> > install stints to improve her circulation. She has spent the better
> > part of this year in and out of the hospital.
> >
> > The others are still waiting, and hoping.
>
> https://www.pfizerhelpfulanswers.com/StartEvaluation.aspx
>
> I assume they're all similar.


That was the first one we contacted.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida