Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 07:05 'foolsrushin' wrote: > Homer J Simpson wrote: > > > "Gordon" <gordonlr(a)DELETEswbell.net> wrote in message > > news:00c0i29vn31ejl71pku1d0r1nfaevj6p4i(a)4ax.com... > > > >>So you are saying they are NOT better Xtians than everyone else? > > > > No, I'm saying that this war on terrorism started long before > > > President Bush and the present Republican administration was > > > involved in any way. > > > But it isn't a war. It is a problem for a police force that requires > > international cooperation, something the US is notoriously unable or > > unwilling to be involved in. > > Bush and 'Boy Blair' poked a nest of hornets, and now we all have to > live with the consequences. Probably the intention was to stir up the > guys to get at their oil, but the miscalculation was that this was a > political issue: probably, whoever thermited the Towers, there was no > recognition that there would be nobody to negotiate with and > conversely, universal Islamic protest, with a highly significant number > of them flying into a scattered self-sacrificial rage. The next and > silly step was to declare war on 'terrorism', effectively inventing Oh no ! Not a conspiracy theorist who believes the towers were thermited ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 07:21 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > > > You've just gone over the cliff with the other lemmings. > > And you think calling people names is a valid substitute for discussing > facts. Nice way to influence people to your point of view. Funny how they do that and I've come in for particular criticism despite saying barely a bad word about any poster in this thread. Graham
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 07:25 unsettled wrote: > Lucas and Wake are, without a doubt, agitator class > Marxist socialists. Lucas keeps denying it, but all > the words and concepts are there from both of them. LMAO ! You really are quite mad. Have the voices in your head been bothering you again ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 23 Nov 2006 07:27 unsettled wrote: > The US doesn't do well with infant mortality. I haven't > delved into why that is. I dare say because you don't have 'free' pre and post-natal services. Graham
From: hill on 23 Nov 2006 07:34
Winfield Hill wrote: > Michael A. Terrell wrote: >> Winfield Hill wrote: >>> Winfield Hill wrote: >>>> >>>> 4200 postings and still going strong. Amazing. >>> >>> Wow, now 7200 posts and still going strong. And most >>> of the posts were under the original subject title. This >>> must be some kind of a record. Certainly it's a stress >>> test for the Google Groups web-page display code, etc. >> >> Never have so many, said so much, about so little! ;-) >> >> I heard of one long flame war that passed 10K posts, >> but I never found out which newsgroup. > > We passed 9000 on the 14th, and are now within 100 posts > of 10,000. Keep up the good work guys, you can do it! Google Groups is having a little trouble with this long thread. The message-heading list said there were 9999 posts, so I hoped to make the 10,000th post, but upon loading all the article references in the left sidebar, it showed more than 10,050 posts, so I missed the opportunity. But, good job guys and gals, over 10,000 posts, and still going strong. And still on topic more or less. I've only read a smattering of the posts here and there, and there's a minimum of flaming SFAICS. Nice to see. |