From: T Wake on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:jcd4m2ttbp577ve6bs25nhqbp7m1qf8tfu(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:43:06 -0000, "T Wake"
> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:
>
>>
>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
>>news:movsl2d4vgeql5obo47viq39ok1j56ig1e(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:20:50 +0000, Eeyore
>>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us:
>>>
>>>>How about you just take a look at when and why this terrorism started ?
>>>
>>>
>>> You are obviously truly clueless as to the reference point for
>>> either.
>>
>>Translating that from idiot into English and it should have read "I have
>>nothing to defend my argument, so I will just insult and pretend I know
>>what
>>I am talking about."
>>
>>Well done Joe.
>>
> You're an abject idiot.

Aren't you cute. At least your vocabulary is increasing.


From: Jonathan Kirwan on
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:38:23 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:03:42 +0000, Eeyore
>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >unsettled wrote:
>> >
>> >> NHS has not
>> >> yet withstood the test of time. Wake me up in a few more
>> >> decades.
>> >
>> >60 years is enough to prove the point imho.
>> >
>> >Graham
>>
>> What all this discussion shows is how any excuse is found/made, by
>> some US folks, for not doing something that has been working pretty
>> well for a very large number of people and for keeping a system that
>> most people WITHIN it as practicing clinicians seem to agree is "in
>> crisis" here.
>>
>> Bizarre.
>
>I agree.
>
>And what would another say 20 years prove that 60 haven't already ? It just
>sounds like an excuse for delay to me.

It's just a way of preserving one's own prejudices, despite evidence
that is contrary.

Jon
From: unsettled on
T Wake wrote:
> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
> news:ejv058$8qk_002(a)s861.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...

>>Yes. What is embedded in your culture is leaving the ruling
>>flavors of decisions to an entity.

> Incorrect.

>>This used to be an
>>anathema in the US. But our self-reliance attitude is slowly
>>leaking away with each new Democrat who follows the current
>>leadership.

> This is _your_ take on it. You have little contact with reality in your own
> country so I do not rate your opinion as representative.

Thanks for pretending to speak for Americans.



From: unsettled on
T Wake wrote:


> It seems apparent that there is no capitalistic system which can ensure a
> company only takes a fair profit, other than the normal supply and demand.
> This in turn falsifies an earlier post by either unsettled or /BAH about
> companies which took more than a fair profit going out of business.

The world according to T.Wake bears little resemblence to
reality.



From: unsettled on
T Wake wrote:

> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:45638C91.511F38F8(a)earthlink.net...
>
>>krw wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Why? McDonalds pays real money. They offer real benefits. Why
>>>wouldn't kids learn how to handle money by being employed? It's
>>>certainly better than learning to live off the government!
>>
>>
>> A kid I know has just finished a year working at a Wendy's
>>restaurant. He has bought a used pickup truck, and a used motorcycle. He
>>helps support his disabled mother, and he only graduated from high
>>school, earlier this year. He has matured a lot in the past year,
>>something that the demented donkey really should try.
>>
>>The first couple months he was wasting his money, but that changed
>>fairly fast. His talk of a fancy stereo system, and other useless toys
>>is gone, and he is trying to save some money for his future.
>>
>
>
> A kid I know has worked at McDonalds for two years and is still a selfish,
> self centred idiot with no concept of the value of money, nor the social
> responsibilities that go with being an adult. He wouldn't know how to save
> for a pair of socks, let alone the future. He is a blight on society despite
> being 20 years old and having worked since he left school.
>
> Just shows anecdotal evidence can cut both ways.

What is shows is that T.Wake believes most people
need keepers, hence Marxist socialism.