From: T Wake on 22 Nov 2006 15:15 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:jcd4m2ttbp577ve6bs25nhqbp7m1qf8tfu(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:43:06 -0000, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:movsl2d4vgeql5obo47viq39ok1j56ig1e(a)4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:20:50 +0000, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >>> >>>>How about you just take a look at when and why this terrorism started ? >>> >>> >>> You are obviously truly clueless as to the reference point for >>> either. >> >>Translating that from idiot into English and it should have read "I have >>nothing to defend my argument, so I will just insult and pretend I know >>what >>I am talking about." >> >>Well done Joe. >> > You're an abject idiot. Aren't you cute. At least your vocabulary is increasing.
From: Jonathan Kirwan on 22 Nov 2006 16:08 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:38:23 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Jonathan Kirwan wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:03:42 +0000, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >unsettled wrote: >> > >> >> NHS has not >> >> yet withstood the test of time. Wake me up in a few more >> >> decades. >> > >> >60 years is enough to prove the point imho. >> > >> >Graham >> >> What all this discussion shows is how any excuse is found/made, by >> some US folks, for not doing something that has been working pretty >> well for a very large number of people and for keeping a system that >> most people WITHIN it as practicing clinicians seem to agree is "in >> crisis" here. >> >> Bizarre. > >I agree. > >And what would another say 20 years prove that 60 haven't already ? It just >sounds like an excuse for delay to me. It's just a way of preserving one's own prejudices, despite evidence that is contrary. Jon
From: unsettled on 22 Nov 2006 16:18 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:ejv058$8qk_002(a)s861.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>Yes. What is embedded in your culture is leaving the ruling >>flavors of decisions to an entity. > Incorrect. >>This used to be an >>anathema in the US. But our self-reliance attitude is slowly >>leaking away with each new Democrat who follows the current >>leadership. > This is _your_ take on it. You have little contact with reality in your own > country so I do not rate your opinion as representative. Thanks for pretending to speak for Americans.
From: unsettled on 22 Nov 2006 16:21 T Wake wrote: > It seems apparent that there is no capitalistic system which can ensure a > company only takes a fair profit, other than the normal supply and demand. > This in turn falsifies an earlier post by either unsettled or /BAH about > companies which took more than a fair profit going out of business. The world according to T.Wake bears little resemblence to reality.
From: unsettled on 22 Nov 2006 16:22
T Wake wrote: > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:45638C91.511F38F8(a)earthlink.net... > >>krw wrote: >> >> >>>Why? McDonalds pays real money. They offer real benefits. Why >>>wouldn't kids learn how to handle money by being employed? It's >>>certainly better than learning to live off the government! >> >> >> A kid I know has just finished a year working at a Wendy's >>restaurant. He has bought a used pickup truck, and a used motorcycle. He >>helps support his disabled mother, and he only graduated from high >>school, earlier this year. He has matured a lot in the past year, >>something that the demented donkey really should try. >> >>The first couple months he was wasting his money, but that changed >>fairly fast. His talk of a fancy stereo system, and other useless toys >>is gone, and he is trying to save some money for his future. >> > > > A kid I know has worked at McDonalds for two years and is still a selfish, > self centred idiot with no concept of the value of money, nor the social > responsibilities that go with being an adult. He wouldn't know how to save > for a pair of socks, let alone the future. He is a blight on society despite > being 20 years old and having worked since he left school. > > Just shows anecdotal evidence can cut both ways. What is shows is that T.Wake believes most people need keepers, hence Marxist socialism. |