Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 26 Nov 2006 08:25 In article <MPG.1fd2d29e99951d13989cde(a)news.individual.net>, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > In article <4568F0E0.FFDBC0D3(a)hotmail.com>, > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > Don Bowey wrote: > > > > > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Heck, they even go to war so Bechtel and Halliburton can pick up > > > > uncontested > > > > contracts. > > > > > > > > Graham > > > > > > You just went to the top my extreme-nonsense-author list. > > > > You reckon the need for re-construction wasn't considered until after the > > event ? > > > > Why were British companies excluded from tendering ? > > US money => US law => US company. Dumb donkey! So. Global in destruction, isolationist in construction? -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: T Wake on 26 Nov 2006 08:25 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4568FB1D.3B378328(a)hotmail.com... > > > krw wrote: > >> usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com says... >> > "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in >> > message >> > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >> I certainly agree on that. "Chavs" have a tendency to crop up most >> > >> in the >> > >> areas most affected by Thacherite policies. >> > > >> > > It seems to be a rebellion to the way things were done. You have the >> > > worst of both systems. The right wing view that everything now >> > > disallowed is permissible, and the left wing view that the state >> > > should >> > > mollycoddle you. Add that to a fanatical hatred of anything not >> > > "local" >> > > and "familar" and you have a chav. >> > > >> > > I'm left of centre myself. I can see the need for the state to keep >> > > checks and balances, but human nature sometimes really makes me cry! >> > >> > Prior to getting embroiled in this thread, I thought I was fairly right >> > of >> > centre. I now see the error in my ways and I am firmly left of centre >> > now. I >> > suspect half the apparently right wing extremists posting on this >> > thread >> > live very different lives away from USENET. >> >> No, you're a left-wing extremist, > > Oh right. The left-wing extemist former soldier ! It is quite funny. But some of the rightwing cranks posting to this thread have no argument so have to resort to insults and try to score points. >> right there with the dumb donkey. >> This isn't surprising since you're both socialist Europeons. > > LMAO ! > > I've only once ever voted Labour and that was at a local election for a > councillor > whose opinions I respected. Tories are probably more socialist than labour now :-)
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 26 Nov 2006 08:27 In article <tn8ah.15760$9v5.11356(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:phineaspuddleduck-CFED3B.14281925112006(a)free.teranews.com... > > In article <phineaspuddleduck-DA5DCC.14260525112006(a)free.teranews.com>, > > Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> They do NOT have a uniform political basis tho. > > > > To add. Although the act of Union between England and Wales meant that > > Welsh Law (codified mainly by Hywel Dda) was superceded by English Law > > (even though in a lot of ways Hywel's laws were better) - the act of > > Union between Scotland and England did not - there is a wealth of > > Scottish law that is unique to them. > > Yes, but I wanna know who ended up with all the unused vowels. > > Eric Lucas We shipped them to Scandinavia where they put diacriticals on them to hide the fact they were Celtic imports ;-) -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 26 Nov 2006 08:28 In article <co8ah.15761$9v5.12967(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:phineaspuddleduck-CFED3B.14281925112006(a)free.teranews.com... > > In article <phineaspuddleduck-DA5DCC.14260525112006(a)free.teranews.com>, > > Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> They do NOT have a uniform political basis tho. > > > > To add. Although the act of Union between England and Wales meant that > > Welsh Law (codified mainly by Hywel Dda) was superceded by English Law > > (even though in a lot of ways Hywel's laws were better) - the act of > > Union between Scotland and England did not - there is a wealth of > > Scottish law that is unique to them. > > Actually, what I *really* wanna know is, who decided that it was a good idea > to make "w" a vowel. > > Eric Lucas w is pronounced 00 hence Cwm ----- coooomb And with a y together you get Hwyl - hooyl -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 08:32
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > >rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> krw wrote: > >> > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> > > krw wrote: > >> > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > >> > > > > krw wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > you'd likely be all for nationalizing the oil companies too. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > What would be the point of that ? > >> > > > > >> > > > It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why > >> > > > don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? > >> > > > >> > > Who said anything about nationalisation ? > >> > > >> > What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? > >> > > >> > Dumb donkey! > >> > >> The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. > >> > >> Private practice continues and GPs run their own practices essentially as > >> they like. They simply receive a salary from the NHS. > > > >If they receive a salary from the NHS, their practices *have* been > >nationalized. They're no longer in control of their business. > >Sheesh! > > > There is something more important here. He cannot conceive > of a medical distriubtion system that isn't completely > controlled by the national government. You're utterly wrong. The government doesn't control the 'medical distribution system' as you call it. There is private practice too as I keep telling you. Graham |