Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 14:02 JoeBloe wrote: > Did you ever achieve a mental age that was greater than 15? Good Lord. Who is *this* talking if not Mr Pottymouth himself ? Graham
From: Ken Smith on 26 Nov 2006 14:04 In article <0nejm254r61ffb0hmon9pe2255atqfheho(a)4ax.com>, JoeBloe <joebloe(a)nosuchplace.org> wrote: >On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:00:07 +0000 (UTC), kensmith(a)green.rahul.net >(Ken Smith) Gave us: > >>Notice that > > > What I noticed is that you don't even examine your cut and paste >work. That entire segment was rife with incorrect characters. > >Got clue? I'm sure if I had changed those characters you would now be claiming that I did not quote exactly. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 14:05 JoeBloe wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message > >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Isn't Canada also under the UK? > >>> > >>>Canada's an independent country now ! I has been for some time in fact. > >>> > >>>Graham > >> > >> Do you mean to tell me that the Queen's visage is no longer on their > >> coins?! Oh my! > > > >Blimey, is the US run by an eagle? > > You're an idiot. > > Her face was on a lot of money in a lot of provinces. So ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 14:08 krw wrote: > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > Don Bowey wrote: > > > > > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Heck, they even go to war so Bechtel and Halliburton can pick up uncontested > > > > > > contracts. > > > > > > > > > > > > Graham > > > > > > > > > > You just went to the top my extreme-nonsense-author list. > > > > > > > > You reckon the need for re-construction wasn't considered until after the event ? > > > > > > > > Why were British companies excluded from tendering ? > > > > > > US money => US law => US company. Dumb donkey! > > > > So it *was* to line the pockets of US construction companies then ! > > Typical dumb donkey logic. It's perfect logic. Foreign companies were excluded from tendering, so US companies knew that a juicy contract was up for grabs. That's a classic way of ensuring a high tender price ( by excluding a lot of the competition ). Graham
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 14:14
T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>Thatcher was quite mad. > > > > I saw no evidence of madness in her book about her years in Downing > > Street. > > That really doesnt surprise me. > > >>She reckoned you could run a country like a small high street shop. She > > fancied > >>herself as royalty of a type too. Quite barking mad, like an eccentric > >>aunt perhaps. > > > > This is your conclusion because she stopped obeying union leaders > > who were Communists and had a clear agenda of instilling this > > political theory in all corners of your country? > > Incorrect. It is a conclusion because she dismantled the UK's industry and > devastated the UK economy for the next decade. And used the income from North Sea oil to pay to keep 4 miilion was it ? on the dole. As a result the UK never really benefitted from being an oil exporting nation. Yet more missed opportunities. Graham |