From: John Fields on
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:57:23 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>John Fields wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:55:34 +0000, Eeyore
>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >John Fields wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:59:03 -0500, Jamie
>> >> <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_(a)charter.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >John Fields wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:05:38 +0000, Eeyore
>> >> >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>unsettled wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>Our post offices are also open till 5PM in most places.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Is that supposed to be some kind of special US achievement ? Ours stay open later
>> >> >>>than that !
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >> That's because they're so inefficient they have to.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >:)) good one!
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> :-)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> JF
>> >
>> >IDIOT
>>
>> ---
>> So, I've reduced you down to your essence; a sad creature with a
>> vocabulary of one word. Works for me!!!
>>
>> --
>> JF
>
>ignorant fool
>
---
Ah! Two words! Silly me...


--
JF
From: John Fields on
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:00:45 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>krw wrote:

>> aW, the dumb donkey is all in a tizzy. Ya' dumb donkey, *you* said
>> they run their business as they see fit, yet are on salary! "On
>> salary" implies they are working to someone else! Dumb donkey.
>
>It's like being a sub-contractor you clown.
>
>Do sub-contractors not run their own businesses as they see fit ?

---
Not always. Sometimes they're required to institute changes in
their accounting, banking, and security procedures before they'll be
allowed to bid on or can be awarded subcontracts.


--
JF
From: John Fields on
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:20:33 -0600, unsettled
<unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote:

>John Fields wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:42:11 -0000, "T Wake"
>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>
>>>You are as much of a crackpot as any of the others in sci.physics.
>
>> ---
>> And I suppose any of the others in sci.physics could say the same
>> about you...
>
>
>Seems that Wake never posits any physics. He just argues.

---
I guess I'll go over there for a little fun! :-)


--
JF
From: Eeyore on


John Fields wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >krw wrote:
>
> >> aW, the dumb donkey is all in a tizzy. Ya' dumb donkey, *you* said
> >> they run their business as they see fit, yet are on salary! "On
> >> salary" implies they are working to someone else! Dumb donkey.
> >
> >It's like being a sub-contractor you clown.
> >
> >Do sub-contractors not run their own businesses as they see fit ?
>
> ---
> Not always. Sometimes they're required to institute changes in
> their accounting, banking, and security procedures before they'll be
> allowed to bid on or can be awarded subcontracts.

Sounds normal to me.

Graham

From: John Fields on
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:30:41 +0000, Phineas T Puddleduck
<phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote:

>In article <manjm2lmbgkdqct9753hlle7a832jevqvs(a)4ax.com>,
> John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:

>> I don't understand what you mean.
>
>Are we controlled by our employers? I guess what I am trying to say is
>that the definition of "control" in this case is a little too fluid to
>be argued either way.

---
I would argue that we _are_ controlled by our employers during the
time we're performing our duties as specified in our contracts.

For example, If I hire a technician and specify the working hours
required and the behavior expected while on the job, the technician
must agree to be bound by those restraints in order to be hired, and
that binding is control.

I don't know if it's still true, but AIUI during the earlier days of
WAL-MART, managers, who were making excellent money for the time
were not allowed to spend over a certain amount for their houses and
cars.

One final example is that if a US firm wants to do business with the
US Department of Defense, then the government will pretty much tell
you how they want you to run your business if you want to do
business with them.

I've asked T Wake to explain how your NHS works, but perhaps you
could also explain? I'm particularly interested in the relationship
between your government and your NHS and how the funding works.


--
JF