From: Ken Smith on
In article <a5b46$4568870a$4fe7197$9114(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>,
unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <456844BE.827AEA7B(a)hotmail.com>,
>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> [....]
>>
>>>Heck, they even go to war so Bechtel and Halliburton can pick up uncontested
>>>contracts.
>>
>>
>> Ben Laden Costruction is a local company they could have used instead.
>
>
>I'd wager that Osama is living with them in Saudi Arabia.

He is driving a cab in New York.

I don't think he would risk going to Saudi Arabia. There are too many
people in high places there who don't like him.


--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Phineas T Puddleduck on
In article <a8njm2160vkv5b275c6mbadrvbonebe84f(a)4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:16:18 +0000, Phineas T Puddleduck
> <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <qggjm251t21je88peq28vq6hqifgqihejt(a)4ax.com>,
> > John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 07:53:45 -0600, unsettled
> >> <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
> >>
> >> >> I have a cap on my usenet.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Not set low enough.....
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Funny! :-)
> >
> >He knows I've plonked him, and still responds. Maroon
> >
> ---
> I see he just got in by proxy! ;)

Well it keeps him happy ;-)

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: Phineas T Puddleduck on
In article <manjm2lmbgkdqct9753hlle7a832jevqvs(a)4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:17:09 +0000, Phineas T Puddleduck
> <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <qogjm2h2o3omue5is96u5d5ceut4bndgjc(a)4ax.com>,
> > John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> >
> >> By and large, yes.
> >>
> >> If I hire a contractor to put a new roof on my house I will expect
> >> him to put a new roof on my house.
> >>
> >> Similarly, I expect that your government, if it's funding the health
> >> service, expects certain norms of competence to be exhibited by the
> >> contractors (doctors) it hires. Also, I'm sure there are certain
> >> basic rules laid down by the government which the health service,
> >> itself, must follow, which _is_ control. Am I wrong?
> >
> >Isn't everyone then, by that standard.
> >
> ---
> I don't understand what you mean.

Are we controlled by our employers? I guess what I am trying to say is
that the definition of "control" in this case is a little too fluid to
be argued either way.

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: T Wake on

"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message
news:92a74$4569de80$4fe775f$22738(a)DIALUPUSA.NET...
>T Wake wrote:
>
>
>
>> True. I unfiltered unsettled because I noticed I was reading more and
>> more of his posts by way of other people's replies, so I wanted to see
>> what the crank was saying himself.
>
>> Unsurprisingly it is still gibberish.
>
> GIGO. Try giving us something to work with, for a change.

Who is this us of which you speak? There is lots of intelligent commentary
being passed on this thread, sadly there are a few people (you for example)
who really cant understand this and have little option but resorting to
insults and hate filled diatribes.

I feel sorry for you.

What do _you_ want to talk about instead? Do you have a nice colouring book
we could talk about?


From: Ken Smith on
In article <4568EC73.70348815(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
[.... UK ....]
>A large number of illegals work here too - estimated to be as many as 1 million.
>It's a current hot topic with us too. Most are 'overstayers' rather than having
>entered illegally in the first place though.

It is a longer swim.

--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge