From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 15:34 John Fields wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > >> >> Don Bowey wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Oregon has it's own medical plan. > >> >> > >> >> And a fine job they do, letting their mental patients run free to > >> >> make threatening phone calls to people. One has lost multiple ISP > >> >> accounts for threatening people online, been bared from the local > >> >> Wal-Mart, and arrested for trying to run over someone, as well. > >> > > >> >Under the NHS he would be 'sectioned'. > >> > >> --- > >> From: > >> > >> http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sectioned > >> > >> sec�tion (skshn) > >> n. > >> 1. A cut or division. > >> 2. The act or process of separating or cutting, especially the > >> surgical cutting or dividing of tissue. > >> 3. A thin slice, as of tissue, suitable for microscopic examination. > >> > >> v. > >> 1. To separate or divide into parts. > >> 2. To cut or divide tissue surgically. > >> > >> And you think the US is crude??? > >> > >> -- > >> JF > > > >IDIOT. > > > --- > Ah! I got it right! No you didn't. Do you fancy establishing for yourself what it means here or would you like me to explain it ? Graham
From: JoeBloe on 26 Nov 2006 15:41 On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:15:40 -0600, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: >On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:46:10 +0000, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>I wonder what'll happen when all their old farts finally die off ? > >--- >Ask Pete Townsend. Don't wait to long, however. :-]
From: unsettled on 26 Nov 2006 15:45 T Wake wrote: > "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message > news:92a74$4569de80$4fe775f$22738(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > >>T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>True. I unfiltered unsettled because I noticed I was reading more and >>>more of his posts by way of other people's replies, so I wanted to see >>>what the crank was saying himself. >> >>>Unsurprisingly it is still gibberish. >> >>GIGO. Try giving us something to work with, for a change. > > > Who is this us of which you speak? There is lots of intelligent commentary > being passed on this thread, sadly there are a few people (you for example) > who really cant understand this and have little option but resorting to > insults and hate filled diatribes. > > I feel sorry for you. > > What do _you_ want to talk about instead? Do you have a nice colouring book > we could talk about? > > See what I mean?
From: unsettled on 26 Nov 2006 15:50 Ken Smith wrote: > In article <79c91$4568893d$4fe7197$9163(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >>Ken Smith wrote: >> >> >>>In article <MPG.1fd11c17f0518b5a989c65(a)news.individual.net>, >>>krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >>>[.....] >>> >>> >>>>Whether you like it or not, radio is an interstate issue. Perhaps >>>>there should be some local control for ultra=-low power, but other >>>>than that 50 FCCs would be a nightmare. Can you imagine getting 50 >>>>certifications for a piece of gear? >>> >>> >>>I like radio just fine. >>> >>>Is radio "interstate commerce" if the broadcast can't be heard in another >>>state? If not, I don't think the constitution gives the federal >>>government preemptive control. >> >>How many microwatts will cross the border when you're >>standing next to a state line with the transmitter? > > > Why is an FM station in SanFransisco under FCC control? Because they all are. Selecting ones to deregulate is nest of snakes nobody wants to put their hands into.
From: T Wake on 26 Nov 2006 15:50
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4569FA55.7789FB8D(a)hotmail.com... > > > John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: >> >> >> Don Bowey wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Oregon has it's own medical plan. >> >> >> >> >> >> And a fine job they do, letting their mental patients run free >> >> >> to >> >> >> make threatening phone calls to people. One has lost multiple ISP >> >> >> accounts for threatening people online, been bared from the local >> >> >> Wal-Mart, and arrested for trying to run over someone, as well. >> >> > >> >> >Under the NHS he would be 'sectioned'. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> From: >> >> >> >> http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sectioned >> >> >> >> sec�tion (skshn) >> >> n. >> >> 1. A cut or division. >> >> 2. The act or process of separating or cutting, especially the >> >> surgical cutting or dividing of tissue. >> >> 3. A thin slice, as of tissue, suitable for microscopic examination. >> >> >> >> v. >> >> 1. To separate or divide into parts. >> >> 2. To cut or divide tissue surgically. >> >> >> >> And you think the US is crude??? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> JF >> > >> >IDIOT. >> > >> --- >> Ah! I got it right! > > No you didn't. > > Do you fancy establishing for yourself what it means here or would you > like me > to explain it ? The Mental Health Act is a wonderful thing :-) |