Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 13 Dec 2006 21:18 unsettled wrote: > Clinton's bombings and killing of civilain populations in > Europe are legend. What complete bullshit ! Graham
From: unsettled on 13 Dec 2006 21:36 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <op.tkayhaxz26l578(a)borek>, > Borek <m.borkowski(a)delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote: > >>On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:15:25 +0100, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>The way the Democrats tested reactions >>>>>>of the US was to go to Europe and give a speech that contained >>>>>>the ideas they wanted a reaction test. BBC would report on >>>>>>the speech. The American news media would report on what >>>>>>the BBC reported minus the fact that it came from some guy's >>>>>>speech. The politician would then watch to see how the >>>>>>voters of the US received it. What you saw a the Democrat >>>>>>platform had been vetted through Europe this way. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Well, considering Europeans are healthier, are happier, live longer, >>>>>are >>>>>more educated and more literate, etc., maybe we could take some >>>>>lessons. >>>> >>>>We do? Good, I am not moving anywehere. >>> >>><grin> You detected the attitude, too. >> >>Nope. I was deadly serious ;) > > > You must find us terribly naive. Slavic thought is pseudowestern.
From: unsettled on 13 Dec 2006 21:37 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <1165669215.800813.245470(a)f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, > hill(a)rowland.org wrote: > >>hill(a)rowland.org wrote: >> >>>Winfield Hill wrote: >>> >>>>Winfield Hill wrote: >>>> >>>>>Michael A. Terrell wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Winfield Hill wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Winfield Hill wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>4200 postings and still going strong. Amazing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Wow, now 7200 posts and still going strong. And most >>>>>>>of the posts were under the original subject title. This >>>>>>>must be some kind of a record. Certainly it's a stress >>>>>>>test for the Google Groups web-page display code, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>>Never have so many, said so much, about so little! ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>>I heard of one long flame war that passed 10K posts, >>>>>>but I never found out which newsgroup. >>>>> >>>>> We passed 9000 on the 14th, and are now within 100 posts >>>>> of 10,000. Keep up the good work guys, you can do it! >>>> >>>> Good job guys and gals, over 10,000 posts, and still >>>> going strong. And still on topic more or less. I've only >>>> read a smattering of the posts here and there, and there's >>>> a minimum of flaming SFAICS. Nice to see. >>> >>>Still going strong, over 11,300 posts, no sign of slowing. >> >>Impressive, zoomed right past 12,000 without slowing, now >>at 12130 posts and climbing towards 13000, going strong. > > > I'm not familiar with web-flavored coding. Would the next > threshold be 100,000? Or is there another trick of the trade? Google would not let me read straight through the thread. It kept recycling to day 1.
From: Ken Smith on 13 Dec 2006 21:38 In article <2a845$4580b397$4fe760c$31003(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > [.....] >> In article <el9bic$bl2$1(a)blue.rahul.net>, >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>There have, however, been periods of more and less violence. The Clinton >>>era was one of the cases of less. >> >> >> That sentence is unbelievable. There was a lot of killing going >> on during the Clinton years. Or is the definition of peace the >> absence of using high tech weapons? > [....] >Clinton's bombings and killing of civilain populations in >Europe are legend. Compare with WW2, WW1, or even Vietnam era. > -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 13 Dec 2006 21:41
In article <elp63h$8qk_007(a)s896.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >In article <elmh2m$88k$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>In article <457D707B.125ED31C(a)hotmail.com>, >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>[.....] >>>Secularism is speading. I believe what we are seeing may be no more than a >>>religious backlash against 'modern thought'. I rather feel it's dommed to >fail. >>> >>>As a kid I recall it was unheard of not to be Christian. Now no-one even >blinks >>>an eye about it but I would like to see our first atheist Prime Minister >though. >> >>The trend is the other way in the US. A smallish fraction of "christian" >>thinking has gained a large following and significant power since the >>1940s. The real threat (long term) of extremists is from the home grown >>ones. > >That danger is now secondary in a list of priorities. The danger >will disppear if Western civilization is destroyed. No, that danger is the one that has the greatest odds of being the one that destroys western civilization. The rot from within is by far the greated danger. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge |