Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 11 Dec 2006 09:12 JoeBloe wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:24:39 -0600, John Fields > <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: > >"T Wake"<usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >>"Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message > >> > >>> I have an interesting theory that we are in fact dealing with an AI > >>> program. This would explain the trouble parsing some statements. It > >>> would also explain the snipping of sections and the resorting to insults. > >>> Both could be used as a way to cover the fact that the parser could not > >>> handle the statements. With reasonable replied the errors would be easier > >>> to notice. Insults on the other hand don't have to make literal sense. > >>> The fact that the same ones seem to get recycled is some evidence for the > >>> theory. > >> > >>I think I agree with you know. > > > >--- > >??? > > > >Speaking of machines... > > The idiot crew has a side conversation going where they think I am an > AI bot. Well....... you haven't mentioned the movie "Total Retard" yet, so maybe your programming's been improved ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 11 Dec 2006 09:14 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >You're aware he's from Poland ? > >> >> > >> >> Yes. He's been giving us some the gossip from that end of > >> >> Europe which is quite different from your end. > >> > > >> >Us ? > >> > >> Those who are reading this thread. > >> > >> >It's only recently I've seen his posts in this thread. > >> > > >> >Would you care to elaborate ? > >> > >> Did you not learn a lot from those posts? > > > >I've only seen a couple. I got the impression he wasn't keen on the idea of > >moving to the USA. > > > >What did you learn ? > > That Poland has taken a different approach during the difficult > and long job of transforming their economic and political > infrastructure from Communist-based market to a Capitalistic market. A different approach to whom though ? > He gave enough pointers that could keep people studying for 20 years. > They seem to have an anomoly (compared to the way the US handles > things) which may or may not pose serious political problems in their > future. What's this anomaly ? > And that's just from one paragraph that he wrote. Gossip has > a lot of information if you listen well. Maybe so, but don't let your imagination run away. Graham
From: jasen on 11 Dec 2006 05:15 On 2006-12-11, JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:59:24 +0000, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >>The reason Europe's doing Galileo is of course because the USA can't be trusted. > > Your knowledge of the world is such a hideous joke. Yeah, the USA can be trusted, but only to do whatever is in its best interest. Galileio and Glonass refect others understanding of that. Bye. Jasen
From: jasen on 11 Dec 2006 05:17 On 2006-12-11, Ken Smith <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote: > BTW: Do you know if the Galileo system has the same intentional > distortions as the GPS system? If not, it could be combined with the GPS > to make better estimates. USA turned off the intentional jitter a few years back. any innacuracies are only those inherant in the system. Bye. Jasen
From: Eeyore on 11 Dec 2006 09:51
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > > >> >> The Cold War was all about which "side" these > >> >> countries would choose. > >> > > >> >Which is a completely different matter. > >> > >> How so? If you start talking about the third world, I figure > >> you are talking about those who hadn't chosen sides. > > > >The sheer concept of USA vs USSR no longer even exists. That > >use of the term is irrelevant. > > The effects of this cold war is what is going on now. Side > effects of decisions and actions made in the 20th century > are going to last for a least 100 years. In what way is this different to the part history played in previous times ? > By then the effects > will be due to the current struggle of Western vs Islamic > civilizations. Has it ever occurred to you that Islam has far more reason to fear the West than vice-versa ? Secularism is speading. I believe what we are seeing may be no more than a religious backlash against 'modern thought'. I rather feel it's dommed to fail. As a kid I recall it was unheard of not to be Christian. Now no-one even blinks an eye about it but I would like to see our first atheist Prime Minister though. Graham |