Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Jan 2007 07:28 In article <459FA66F.2CB0CFEC(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >It is however pretty clear to me that a former g/f of mine had her land >> >> >line tapped for being active in CND. It was hilariously obvious. >> >> >> >> So you've already realized that privacy does not include landlines. >> >> Why do you think it is going to include broadcasts over thru the air? >> >> >> >> I don't understand this logic. >> > >> >That tap would have needed a warrant though. >> >> And the tap gets one; it's the law. > >Your taps don't need warrants any more though do they ? Yes, they do require warrants. Perhaps you should stop confusing tapping with monitoring. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Jan 2007 07:41 In article <45A0E100.62E7E990(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> So you've already realized that privacy does not include landlines. >> >> Why do you think it is going to include broadcasts over thru the air? >> >> >> >> I don't understand this logic. >> > >> >The tap would have been put in place _after_ a warrant was issued. Do you >> >see how that is different. >> >> And that's how it works today. There is a difference between a phone >> tap and sampling hundreds of sounds for certain utterances. > >No there isn't ! You should try to think this one through a little bit more. You might start with radio and TV transmissions. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Jan 2007 07:44 In article <459F9E54.540DD7DE(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > >> > Hey, did you know that a McDonald's in Cornwall had to close because they >> > simply weren't getting enough customers any more ? >> >> Not really surprising in Cornwall. Full of old age pensioners.... > >The point is that it traded ok for years but demand dropped. That's not just >down to pensioners. > > >> > There's hope for sanity yet. >> >> Maybe. Personally I think of McDonalds as a choice in the same manner as >> (for example) Sayers. > >I don't know Sayers ! > > >> I find it hard to think of food as "good" or "bad." If >> you ate McDonalds three times a day every day then fair enough, but I would >> say the same of some one who ate nothing but lettuce three times a day every >> day. > >Well.... I can think of McDonalds as providing fairly indifferent and not very >tasty food. Their rolls in particular taste to me like cardboard. > > >> My view is that educating people and then giving them the choice is the only >> solution. > >That makes sense too. > > >> I rarely eat at McDonalds (I think the last time I did was in >> August), but for example, when I drive to Glasgow next week and I stop off >> at a service station is having a Big Mac a "bad thing?" As long as the >> choice remains (for example, I may choose to have the worlds biggest big mac >> meal but no breakfast or tea that day), then I don't really see what problem >> any one else should have with it. > >It's just a shame that such places can't sell healthier food. They are. It costs more money to not use real fat when frying potatoes. So the prices went up. If McDonald's prices are so high that they can't stay in budiness, there going to be an awful messy economy pretty soon. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Jan 2007 07:46 In article <459F9F3A.EE2B35E1(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >T Wake wrote: > >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> >> > Little girls learn all about how sound carries. >> >> Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Interception of mobile telephones is nothing >> to do with how sound carries. > >I wonder if BAH was a bit of a gossip in her youth ? You are again foolish. Little girls are getting trained for motherhood. How do you think your mother could detect what you were up to before you killed yourself? /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Jan 2007 07:52
In article <50c77$45a06337$cdd0846a$24498(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >T Wake wrote: > > >> I personally think education is wasted on the young. > >For the most part, the brightest educate themselves, with >"the educational system" providing general guidance and >direction. You have forgotten the most important part of education: access to the knowledge that's been written down. <snip> /BAH |