Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Phil Carmody on 7 Jan 2007 14:56 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: > But fat is becoming illegal....or haven't you noticed? No, transfats are becoming illegal. That and tobacco. Don't you see the trend? It's things beginning with 't' that are under attack! Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: T Wake on 7 Jan 2007 15:24 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:enqqe8$8qk_005(a)s980.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <50c77$45a06337$cdd0846a$24498(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>T Wake wrote: >> >> >>> I personally think education is wasted on the young. >> >>For the most part, the brightest educate themselves, with >>"the educational system" providing general guidance and >>direction. > > You have forgotten the most important part of education: access > to the knowledge that's been written down. And avoidance of the knowledge which has been made up.
From: T Wake on 7 Jan 2007 15:25 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:enqp0r$8ss_012(a)s980.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <459FA66F.2CB0CFEC(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >It is however pretty clear to me that a former g/f of mine had her >>> >> >land >>> >> >line tapped for being active in CND. It was hilariously obvious. >>> >> >>> >> So you've already realized that privacy does not include landlines. >>> >> Why do you think it is going to include broadcasts over thru the air? >>> >> >>> >> I don't understand this logic. >>> > >>> >That tap would have needed a warrant though. >>> >>> And the tap gets one; it's the law. >> >>Your taps don't need warrants any more though do they ? > > Yes, they do require warrants. Perhaps you should stop > confusing tapping with monitoring. An appeal to semantics as a defence.
From: T Wake on 7 Jan 2007 15:27 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:enqpqn$8qk_002(a)s980.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45A0E100.62E7E990(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> >> >>> >> So you've already realized that privacy does not include landlines. >>> >> Why do you think it is going to include broadcasts over thru the air? >>> >> >>> >> I don't understand this logic. >>> > >>> >The tap would have been put in place _after_ a warrant was issued. Do >>> >you >>> >see how that is different. >>> >>> And that's how it works today. There is a difference between a phone >>> tap and sampling hundreds of sounds for certain utterances. >> >>No there isn't ! > > You should try to think this one through a little bit more. > You might start with radio and TV transmissions. If you are going to try and use semantic arguments you need to become a bit more accurate with your own terminology. And there isn't really a difference between monitoring everything one person says and monitoring everything every one says - other than scale.
From: T Wake on 7 Jan 2007 15:28
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:enqq42$8qk_004(a)s980.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <459F9F3A.EE2B35E1(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>T Wake wrote: >> >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> >>> > Little girls learn all about how sound carries. >>> >>> Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Interception of mobile telephones is >>> nothing >>> to do with how sound carries. >> >>I wonder if BAH was a bit of a gossip in her youth ? > > You are again foolish. Little girls are getting trained for > motherhood. Seriously, did you grow up in the seventeenth century? > How do you think your mother could detect what you were up to before you > killed yourself? |