Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 14 Jan 2007 17:50 On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:46:26 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: >> >> In article <45A96EEA.690D405F(a)earthlink.net>, >> Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> >Ken Smith wrote: >> >> >> >> I worry more about the poor state of education. Someone in the airforce >> >> may get hungry and push the button he things says "lunch" --- Well, you're clearly not a candidate for the higher echelons of the Air Force, since 'things' ain't 'thinks' and if your visual acuity confuses 'lunch' with 'launch', then you belong on the ground. And away from anything that says 'launch' on it, wouldn't you agree? I think most of the guys who're flying don't have that problem since they're largely the creme de la creme of what we have to offer and are flying machines that we've each paid a dollar or two to get into the air. You guys, even, are part of the program, so why do you denigrate it? --- >> > Then its a really good thing that you aren't in the Air Force. >> >> You would never get me to sign up for such duty. I know my limitations. > > > It must painful to admit that you're not good enough. --- "It must _be_...? That's not fair. He may be talking about that he's philosophically opposed to the wanton destruction of human life for political expedience, in which case he knows where he'll deny his support. Good on him. -- JF
From: MassiveProng on 14 Jan 2007 17:52 On 14 Jan 2007 22:46:45 +0200, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> Gave us: >Paraphrased to "cops shot an ex footballer". Call that "clear"? >Not as clear as the space between your ears. I see you are suffering from LardusMouthusOflexia. Bet your house stinks.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 15 Jan 2007 04:28 John Fields wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:46:26 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" > <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > >Ken Smith wrote: > >> > >> In article <45A96EEA.690D405F(a)earthlink.net>, > >> Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >> >Ken Smith wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I worry more about the poor state of education. Someone in the airforce > >> >> may get hungry and push the button he things says "lunch" > > --- > Well, you're clearly not a candidate for the higher echelons of the > Air Force, since 'things' ain't 'thinks' and if your visual acuity > confuses 'lunch' with 'launch', then you belong on the ground. And > away from anything that says 'launch' on it, wouldn't you agree? > > I think most of the guys who're flying don't have that problem since > they're largely the creme de la creme of what we have to offer and > are flying machines that we've each paid a dollar or two to get into > the air. > > You guys, even, are part of the program, so why do you denigrate it? > --- > > >> > Then its a really good thing that you aren't in the Air Force. > >> > >> You would never get me to sign up for such duty. I know my limitations. > > > > > > It must painful to admit that you're not good enough. > > --- > "It must _be_...? > > That's not fair. > > He may be talking about that he's philosophically opposed to the > wanton destruction of human life for political expedience, in which > case he knows where he'll deny his support. > > Good on him. No, John, I'm loosing my eyesight from diabetes, and have to depend on the spell checker. Thanks for noticing, though. In fact, I was legally blind in one eye when I was drafted, in the '70s. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: jmfbahciv on 15 Jan 2007 07:40 In article <sivkq2pl0b7gv8urglv2oo9hkdcia9elvg(a)4ax.com>, Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: >I want to highlight just two comments from a single post by you and >bring them to the fore: > >On Sun, 14 Jan 07 13:05:58 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >><snip> >> The only conclusion left is that the Democrat leadership is insane. >><snip> >> The past two months I've been trying to figure out why European-type >> thinking is broken. >><snip> > >So you feel that Democratic leaders are insane and that European >thinking is broken? With respect to this problem, yes. > >You ever stop to wonder why _you_ might feel this way? Ever look to >yourself to find any problems in thinking and then improve yourself? Yes. I have to do this all the time. >Or do you always just blame others? No. > >In any case, I find these two comments from you as prima facie >evidence that you need to look more closely at yourself. It almost >goes without saying and I think you should realize this, even if only >dimly. The only conclusion you can have is that I have to be wrong even though the past indicates otherwise. I am looking at thinking patterns. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 15 Jan 2007 07:42
In article <sivkq2pl0b7gv8urglv2oo9hkdcia9elvg(a)4ax.com>, Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> wrote: I cannot read your 651 block post because it's too large to fit in my machine's core. Sorry. /BAH |