Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 14 Jan 2007 13:28 On 14 Jan 2007 12:44:47 +0200, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> Gave us: >MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> writes: >> On 13 Jan 2007 22:32:46 +0200, Phil Carmody >> <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> Gave us: >> >> >Hmmm, can't find that story. I can find this one though: >> ><<< >> >Chargers LB shot by off-duty officer >> >> >> What part of FORMER NFL player do you not understand? > >It's quite alright if you can't find the reference to back up >your claim. It appears you have a reputation for that here already >and thus no further tarnishing has taken place. > It wasn't Foley, dumbass! They blew the guy away. Are you sure your reading skills are up to snuff to be in Usenet? I made it clear in my first post about it.
From: Ken Smith on 14 Jan 2007 13:53 In article <eod9rm$8qk_001(a)s849.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: [....] >I have wondered and have tried to figure out why. The only conclusion >left is that the Democrat leadership is insane. Sam: See that pink elephant? Tom: No, there is no pink elephant. Sam: You are insane. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: unsettled on 14 Jan 2007 13:53 Ken Smith wrote: > In article <eodeen$8qk_004(a)s849.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > [....] >>Anybody who insists that the extremists are criminals. To treat >>their actions as criminal, you must arrest and put them on trial. >>This implies that the arresting officiers have jurisdiction wherever >>and whenever these extremists reside. This approach requires a >>global police force that is not answerable to any single nation. > No, you have it wrong. You don't need a global police force to do it. > Criminals who have crossed borders are dealt with all the time. If > someone commits a murder in the US and then runs to England, he is not > safe. This is how it would be for the terrorists if they were called the > criminals they are. Idealism will get you nowhere. Most terrorists are not considered criminals and therefore not punishable under Islamic law. snip
From: unsettled on 14 Jan 2007 13:58 Ken Smith wrote: > In article <eodhg2$8qk_002(a)s849.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > >>In article <eobnu0$oor$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > > [....] > >>>Treat them like the IRA and or the Mafia. To help take down organized >>>crime, the RICO law was created. If tools are needed, they can be made. >> >>So you are expecting a UN jurisdiction to handle these people and >>the messes they make. > > > No, you have it completely wrong. The UN had nothing to do with the > Mafia. You seem to have this bogus idea about what happens if you don't > call it a war and it is coloring everything you think about the subject. > You would do far better to thik of the terrorists as being like the Mafia. > You will quickly see how that model works whereas yours doesn't. > > > > >> Are you also willing to subject the >>Constitution to the UN charter? >> >>That's what you are asking for and demanding. > > > No, it isn't. Actually what you're asking for is even more impossible, that any nation harboring a person we call a "terrorist" be punished.
From: Eeyore on 14 Jan 2007 14:04
unsettled wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > > >>Anybody who insists that the extremists are criminals. To treat > >>their actions as criminal, you must arrest and put them on trial. > >>This implies that the arresting officiers have jurisdiction wherever > >>and whenever these extremists reside. This approach requires a > >>global police force that is not answerable to any single nation. > > > No, you have it wrong. You don't need a global police force to do it. > > Criminals who have crossed borders are dealt with all the time. If > > someone commits a murder in the US and then runs to England, he is not > > safe. This is how it would be for the terrorists if they were called the > > criminals they are. > > Idealism will get you nowhere. What's wrong with the above ? > Most terrorists are not considered criminals and > therefore not punishable under Islamic law. What the heck gave you that half-witted idea ? Graham |