Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 11:42 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:45:08 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Kurt Ullman wrote: > >> So, we just all capitulate and become Muslim states? > >Since when was that an option ? > >You really shouldn't give so much credence to what a few thousand ppl say they >want. --- And much, much less to you. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Michael A. Terrell on 6 Oct 2006 11:45 Kurt Ullman wrote: > > In article <4525DA2C.7CFA4E5E(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > > > > > So, you don't carry anything else?........... > > > .........An insurance card so you don't die while waiting for > > > the hospital to make sure they will be paid for their services? > > > > You really don't know much about the UK do you ? > > > > Medical services are free. > > > You pay for them through taxes (among other ways). They ain't free no > matter what the politicians tell you. Then Eeyore is being cheated out of the mental health care he's paid for. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: John Larkin on 6 Oct 2006 11:45 On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:26:29 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>Our freedoms are under threat as a result of American stupidity. > >Now I understand you. It is not Bin Laden's fault that he >is going to kill a lot of people. It's the Americans' fault >that caused Islamic extremists to want to destroy Western >civilization. That's actually true. "American" culture, which is actually world culture, is the thing they fear will seduce their sons and liberate their daughters. As it must. John
From: lucasea on 6 Oct 2006 11:45 "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:eg5nmo$sig$3(a)blue.rahul.net... > In article <452561A0.981EE687(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>Jim Thompson wrote: >> >>> You must be a Democrat. >> >>So when does the new Civil War start ? > > I estimate that it could fester for at least another 2 years before it > gets to the point where the violence becomes self sustaining. And our plan is to stay there, bolstering the non-self-sustaining violence, until it *does* become self-sustaining. > In the US > it is normal to state which party you belong to when registering to vote. No, it isn't. You only have to declare if you want to vote in a primary election, so that they can make sure you vote in the right primary. > The lower tech one is the liars contest where the speaker must convince > the public of a long list of things that aren't true. And as a matter of history, fear is a great tool in doing this. Make people afraid enough, and they'll believe anything out of your mouth that makes them not afraid. The American public, at least half of them, seem never to have learned this aspect of history. > Most Americans are well aware that a civil war can never really happen. > Can you imagine trying to fight a war where each soldier has to say to the > one for the other side "Excuse me. I have to shoot you. Would you prefer > it in the head or the heart." before he can pull the trigger. Har dee har har har, Alice. Eric Lucas
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 11:46
"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:kp8bi29dil5b9l2ib6oakv7sn227f8450o(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:49:33 -0500, John Fields > <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: > >>On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:48:51 +0100, Eeyore >><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >>> >>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>> > lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush >>>> >>calling >>>> >>a criticism "unacceptable." >>>> > >>>> > Which criticism was unacceptable? >>>> > >>>> > I don't understand you people; first you complain that he can't >>>> > think for himself; then, you object when he expresses his opinion >>>> > about >>>> > something. >>>> > >>>> > You can't have it both ways. >>>> >>>> Calling "criticism" "unacceptable" is not an opinion--it's an >>>> argument-winning tactic that involves tacitly silencing anybody who >>>> disagrees with you. >>> >>>Criticism was considered unacceptable in 1930s Germany too. >> >>--- >>If the parallel is valid, expect to hear someone knocking on your >>door because of your antics here. > > Ooooooohhhh.... That would be so.... R I G H T E O U S !!! > > I'd love to see the video on Cops! Do you deliberately conform to stereotypes? Are you infact a plant for the left wingers to create ridicule? |