From: Ken Smith on 6 Oct 2006 09:17 In article <fu8bi2h0pfrimp5kfqphg8g8ner12tb8vg(a)4ax.com>, JoeBloe <joebloe(a)nosuchplace.org> wrote: [...] > ESPECIALLY in time of war. No, no .... are we at war! When did this war get declared? I must have missed the debate in congress and the vote. When was it? What country is our enemy? -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 6 Oct 2006 09:20 In article <eg3f0u$j7l$8(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker <lparker(a)emory.edu> wrote: [.....] >>Yes, from *OUTSIDE* the country (i.e. foreign intelligence). There >>were no domestic calls "tapped", without warrant. >> > >First, we don't know that. Secondly, when did the 4th amendment get repealed >for an American citizen calling, say, France? They may be ordering some of that yucky French wine instead of the nice californian stuff. The NSA should not listen in; they should disconnect the call. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 09:20 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:07:41 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:o6i8i2ptrh2q1n34ss14v6f23o7n0vovco(a)4ax.com... > >>>When you see that half of the workers are tearing down the outhouse faster >>>than the other half are building it then it is a reasonable conclusion >>>that >>>organization was not a high priority. >> >> --- >> What was being talked about was strategies which are being >> formulated, in secret, to deal with terrorism. >> >> What are you talking about? > >The obvious results of these brilliant 'strategies'. --- I see. You have no idea what the strategies are or how or if they're being implemented, yet you're prepared to comment on what their "obvious" results are? Sounds to me like you're saying you'll know what supper's going to be without even asking the cook. Amazing talent. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 09:29 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:15:26 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:24:11 +0100, Eeyore >> >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Ever wondered why it [international terrorism] happens to the USA >> >> most btw ? >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Nope. Losers want to blame everyone but themselves for their >> >> predicaments and, so, take shots at the champ in an attemp to try to >> >> convince themselves that they're not impotent. >> > >> >Let me explain then. >> > >> >It becasue America pokes its nose into stuff that's none of its business >> >all the time and just generally likes to kick the little guys around. >> >> --- >> Translation: >> >> Because America has the wherewithal and the will to do whatever it >> wants to, and all the little guys resent that. > >That too. Especially when it makes no sense. --- What makes sense to us might not make sense to you, but that doesn't mean that'll keep us from doing it. --- >What do you think about the Vincennes shooting down an Iranian Airbus then ? --- From: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/3/newsid_4678000/4678707.stm "The USS Vincennes had tracked the plane electronically and warned it to keep away. When it did not the ship fired two surface-to-air missiles, at least one of which hit the airliner." I think the airplane's pilot should have had the good sense to heed the Vincennes' warning. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 09:32
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:16:03 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: >> >> >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >> > >> >> >> Reputedy Mohammed went a little ga-ga in his later years. Anyway, show me >> >> >> a religious text that*isn't* >> >> >> riddled with contradictions. >> >> > >> >> >They're all really just books of magic spells anyway. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> No, they're not. They're survival manuals. >> > >> >That's a very strange idea. >> >> --- >> Think about it for a while. > >I don't need to. --- It's beyond you anyway, so whether you need to or not is moot. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |