Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Kurt Ullman on 6 Oct 2006 11:20 In article <eg5o0o$hr$1(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > In article > <kurtullman-8C3615.09514505102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx>, > Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >In article <eg3143$okg$2(a)blue.rahul.net>, > > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > [....] > >> > >> On (2) we have external evidence that he did try to get OBL. It was all > >> over the news and the Neocons yelled "wag the dog" about it. > > > > If he did not consistently get interested in OBL about the time > >Monica was to testify, etc., he might not have heard that as much. > > Do you have any proof of either part of that? Google the attacks and monica's testimony. Look at the dates. Stare in wild wonder.
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 11:19 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:25:49 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:57:00 -0500, John Fields ><jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > >> >>England, the US, and every other country in the world that has had >>to fight for its existence was founded on terrorism or caused to >>come into existence because of terrorism. > >How was the US founded on terrorism? I've read that not a single >civilian was executed in the US Revolutionary War. The only people >that were shot at were British soldiers and their indian allies. There >were certainly no bombs planted in mathetplaces. --- Insurgents, then, or guerrillas. I was talking about the tactics of the various militias before the regular armies were established. --- >The important battles of the Rev War were fought between real armies. --- Yup. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Kurt Ullman on 6 Oct 2006 11:23 In article <eg5oll$hr$5(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > In article > <kurtullman-0481F2.19314905102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx>, > Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > [...] > > >Managed to put down the > >chimney of the Chinese Embassy during Kosovo, too, Rip roaring accuracy. > > You are assuming it was an error. Consider that it may have been on > purpose and think back. Nope., In fact the follow-up investigation showed that they had targeted that building because... wait for it... the Kosovo phone book noted it was the HQ for one of the nasties. Who had since moved out the Chinese guys moved in.
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 11:26 On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:28:26 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:kce8i2l54rst8l51d8ekjq7iopiiq6530l(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 19:49:49 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >>>news:8ft5i211dol6qj0uqbuo75l7bsr01uf60v(a)4ax.com... >> >>>> --- >>>> Sometimes a crude allegory serves admirably in making a point >>>> quickly. >>>> >>> >>>On both sides of the debate.... >> >> --- >> Yes, but often the point made by the side with the crude allegory >> overshadows the implicit admonition against political incorrectness >> enjoyed, silently, by the other side. > >Fair one and (IMHO) neither are really valid debating styles. If people want >to throw insults at each other, great. I have no problem with that. > >> That is, if that's what you had in mind. > >I am not sure what I had in mind. > >> If it isn't, and both sides revert to crude allegory, then the >> psycholgy underlying the symbology can get very interesting. > >Yes, although it does imply that both sides of the debate are somewhat >fixated with inserting things up their own backsides.......... > >Interesting symbology but, based on the mental picture I have of the >"average" person on USENET, not pleasant.... --- LOL, nor was it intended to be! What I was alluding to was that domination might not seem to be so bad if it occurs a little at a time. Anyway, I think that's what I was alluding to. Seems like that was a long time ago and I'm starting to lose track... -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 11:29
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:4525CE02.456E30F6(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> I don't have to. Your country can intercept other nations to gather >> foreign >> intelligence. > > > Unless you are a terrorist, what are you worried about? > Interesting argument. I work in corporate security and often work for governmental organisations, will you please surrender to me all your bank records so I can check what transactions take place. I also want you to record your movements and actions at all times. I am sure, that as you are not a terrorist, you will have no qualms against this. I await the data. |