Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 14 Oct 2006 00:50 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message > > > A-bombs don't work at zero elevation very well. > > They work just fine at zero elevation Wasn't there this term called 'groundburst' ? Graham
From: Jonathan Kirwan on 14 Oct 2006 01:33 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:36:51 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)nosuchplace.org> wrote: >> >(Ken Smith) Gave us: >> > >> >> The 6 party talks produced something. The US >> >>violated it on Sept 23. >> > >> > How so? CITE? >> >> http://www.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2005/54430.htm >> >> http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_editorial/161703.html >> >> The US agreed to work towards normal relations. One does not do this by >> working to cut off their use of the world bank for exchange. > >Talk about being damn stupid. > >When does Bush get impeached ? > >When does the Republican Party get impeached ? Sorry, Graham. We're under the thumb of a dictator. :) Isn't there a European rapid deployment force you can use? Jon
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 05:06 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:9nc0j21i05lmqbr1lmn1u3inha59cckf4h(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:24:29 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>You can guess what she wants you to think she has done and places she >>wants >>you to think she has worked. >> >>The fact you cant determine the veracity and more importantly, because you >>don't seem to care, speaks volumes about you. > > > Wrong again, dipshit. I know more about her than you think. "I > don't know her" means that I do not know her personally. I do, > however "know her" through reading years of posts by her, and she has > orders of magnitude more credibility than a twit like you could or > will ever have. Oh well. I am deeply hurt. You have destroyed my life. My only existence was based on getting you to worship my posts and I have failed. In reality, you are still woefully incapable of actually understanding what other people's posts say. For example, you have blatantly misread mine - your response highlights that. You _still_ revel in something you have no way of being sure about. Seriously, are you aware that pretty much every post you make shows your lack of understanding?
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 05:07 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:pqc0j2thar9t8s0b01s2n2k17dcmhvmdpu(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:27:57 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>It still isn't. 100% paranoia impedes people's abilities to do their job. >>Paranoia is a serious mental illness. > > Stop being paranoid about paranoia, dumbfuck. Awww. Did you run out of sensible things to say? Such a shame. One day you will be able to string together conversations like an adult.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 05:12
"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:9sc0j2d0156tsab9e68ndfvi6814kfu54j(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:27:57 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>Taking reasonable precautions is not paranoia. Taking excessive >>precautions >>is often called "paranoia." > > > Th key fallacy is the word "called". That doesn't meant that it > "IS". Thank you for agreeing with me. > You fucked up again, dipshit. Nope. This was the crux of my argument. You have agreed with me and not realised it. Sadly, you really are not capable of understanding the posts you respond to. This problem has meant that, in your urge to insult, you have lost track of where the conversation was going. Well done. You are a shining example of what is Great in America. Now, did you ever come back with any of the supporting evidence for your previous claims or are you going to gloss over that? |