Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 13 Oct 2006 22:40 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:32e0j21hngspi3td1ifqa06sls8r0odoov(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:49:35 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>NK has lots of ships. Not to mention there are a significant number of >>cargo >>ships which fly flags of convenience. > > > Cargo ships don't launch missiles, dumbfuck. Who needs missiles? > A-bombs don't work at zero elevation very well. They work just fine at zero elevation. Granted, you get more destruction when it is detonated above ground, but you'd still wipe out a large area and kill a lot of people if it is detonated on the ground. Tell you what, you stand in whatever coastal city you choose, and we'll see how well you survive a thermonuclear weapon detonated onboard a ship in the port. Why do you think the Port Authority of every major port in the US routinely checks containers for radiation? Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 13 Oct 2006 22:43 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:vuf0j21obc2hhvqtto5peica32pmpf4nal(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:48:59 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >>Yeah, well that would be an accurate description of JoeBloe as well. > > > I make the world a better place Prove it. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 13 Oct 2006 22:49 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:poj0j25epgvc76airn680d7kubk6acs3c7(a)4ax.com... > > You are a brainless, sub-human, jihadist. Prove it. > How you ever gained > employ with a mil contractor I'll not know for some time to come... > but I can find out. Yeah, right. Eric Lucas
From: Eeyore on 14 Oct 2006 00:18 Daniel Mandic wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > > > see a psychologist about that, dumbfuck. > > > > You are a classic example of a 'talking vegetable'. > > > > Graham > > Surely grown in Spain, under plastic soil covering. I suspect you're right about that ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 14 Oct 2006 00:19
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Good. For a second, I thought I hadn't explained well enough. > Thanks. So, you admit you're a former spook ? Explains the insane paranoia for sure. Graham |