Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 10:49 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:nkk1j2pjmdoeus9m9rgvb26t6btff0rn3l(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:20:03 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>> Why make such a big fuss over it ? >> >>Because JoeBloe reads too many Tom Clancy novels. >> > You're an idiot. I already told you I don't read fiction OR > "novels" for that matter. Yeah, but I think you are lying. > I work in the real world. I doubt it.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 10:54 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:srk1j2devhpjs397osin0mr9d84is4aelh(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:32:57 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>> Not true. >> >>Very true. In the UK it is more commonly called INFOSEC, which is another >>American term. > > > Wrong again. It is the same reference among ALL US allies that > utilize US gear, and they ALL do. That is what the word "joint" > means, dumbass. Really? Well, I already know the answer to that. You are wrong. COMSEC is a concept and is not related to specific equipment. You have no idea what you are talking about here.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 10:58 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:f0l1j21vh3fgu182id9oh4nleogffe779b(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:32:57 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>but as I am sure you >>are aware COMSEC is not about computers and networks. > > > Wrong again, idiot. ANY time data is exchanged, and it passes > electronically, it is communicated. > > It encompasses data voice video, et al. Try again, guess boy! > > Gaineth Thyself A Clue Brilliant. You really do have comprehension issues don't you. COMSEC is not about computers and networks it is about communications. When Computers and networks communicate COMSEC guidelines may be enforced. Before the digitalisation of the Battlefield COMSEC was in use. COMSEC meant controlling what was said over radios (specifically unencrypted links). COMSEC applied to voice calls. As more and more became packet data INFOSEC took over as the buzzword of choice. Can I suggest, if you actually have a valid point to make and aren't truly retarded, you spend a moment reading the posts you are replying to? COMSEC is not limited to computers and networks. COMSEC is independent of _any_ data exchange. COMSEC covers a conversation between two people which can be overheard. Your lack of knowledge is entertaining. Feel free to snip this as much as you want, I know long posts make you head hurt.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 10:58 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:55l1j2pa7f97jokngn1nphh4santb7uu63(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:32:57 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>You can doubt. It is still true. The term was in use in the British >>Military >>until a few years ago, when they did have a COMSEC Monitoring Team. But it >>no longer exists and the terminology has evolved. >> >>Please, try to keep up. > > > You ain't real bright, boy! Compared to you, I am.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 11:00
"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:18l1j21idb7b4qp7nubbcgsfhrdnajah9j(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:32:57 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>Your fixation on COMSEC is interesting, given that you think I am an ITSy >>practitioner am I right in thinking you think COMSEC is Computer Security? >>In reality it deals more with the use of telephones (especially mobiles), >>relays and "loose lips." > > > Wrong again, dipshit! Yet in MSG: news:f0l1j21vh3fgu182id9oh4nleogffe779b(a)4ax.com you wrote "Wrong again, idiot. ANY time data is exchanged, and it passes electronically, it is communicated. It encompasses data voice video, et al. Try again, guess boy!" Still implying you think COMSEC is related to computers. COMSEC isn't even tied to electronics. You really don't know what you are talking about. |