Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 08:17 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:32:57 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >Anyway, genius, have you decided to ignore the other claims you have made >and refused to provide evidence about? Just like you deny not knowing a goddamned thing about this subject.
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 08:19 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:36:31 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >Agreeing is different from sycophancy. You dont "agree" like a normal >person. It's not for a twit like you to say what is or is not normal.
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 08:24 On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:52:54 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:u4e0j29hv73hgniqkvg5aaoc34rbr1k2o3(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:49:35 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >>>Go back to your Ghost Recon game or what ever it is you are learning >>>global >>>politics from. >> >> You're an idiot. > >I've been called worse by people more intelligent than you. > And you likely qualified then ,and you certainly do now.
From: JoeBloe on 14 Oct 2006 08:32 On Sat, 14 Oct 06 10:38:14 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > Now I'm beginning >to think that these people don't know what a nuclear bomb is; >it is possible that a lot of people think that it's just a >roadside bomb with a slightly bigger bang. They are worse than a horse with blinders on. Someone gouged out their eyes, but it was right after they were fed a huge load of bullshit.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 10:49
"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:gck1j2pjpaabrk99uue5e58dri0aovcn1e(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:20:03 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>It has fallen out of favour a bit recently and been largely (especially in >>the commercial sector) with INFOSEC (information security) > > > COMSEC includes INFOSEC, you retarded twit, and NO, it has not > "fallen out of favor". No it doesnt. > To pass info between two points or locations, one COMmunicates it, > you idiot! Yes. INFOSEC includes security of the information in storage, not just in transit. Please, try to stop making a fool of yourself. > Ever heard of IP encryption? Yes. Why is it relevant? > Just so you know, I am not talking about software based solutions. Yet all your examples are confined to the internet. COMSEC deals with much more than IP based communication. INFOSEC deals with even more. > You really dug yourself into a pit with this one, dumbass. You're > absolutely lost to make the remark you have made here. Really? You have less than a fraction of a clue but you feel that throwing terms you vaguely understand into the conversation gives you credibility? Brilliant. You think that snipping the context of posts and ranting a reply makes you look clever. You may be older than it appears but you have the mentality of a bullied teenager. > Guess what T Weak... YOU have fallen out of favor. Basically due to > utter stupidity. Oh well. Was I ever in favour? > Guess you'd better WAKE up! Very original. |