Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 11:00 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:p9l1j2p83t8kv8eh5ifpaevfn75d47gf67(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:32:57 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>Anyway, genius, have you decided to ignore the other claims you have made >>and refused to provide evidence about? > > > Just like you deny not knowing a goddamned thing about this subject. That is a no then. You just make things up to keep your ranting going. Well done monkey boy.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 11:01 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:tcl1j2plemiujpg9sh4degu4pfdrhuk3qf(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:36:31 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>Agreeing is different from sycophancy. You dont "agree" like a normal >>person. > > > It's not for a twit like you to say what is or is not normal. Nice answer. Try to wipe up after yourself.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 11:03 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:dml1j2hmgtp7l11rf3646uflhasr8m560p(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:52:54 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:u4e0j29hv73hgniqkvg5aaoc34rbr1k2o3(a)4ax.com... >>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:49:35 +0100, "T Wake" >>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>> >>>>Go back to your Ghost Recon game or what ever it is you are learning >>>>global >>>>politics from. >>> >>> You're an idiot. >> >>I've been called worse by people more intelligent than you. >> > And you likely qualified then ,and you certainly do now. Probably. The problem is you aren't intelligent enough to come up with a sensible insult. You aren't even clever enough to keep up with the conversation and stop yourself agreeing with me sometimes.
From: T Wake on 14 Oct 2006 11:22 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:v4m1j21hs2o8rhd9b6fusdke5nrcrc3c5l(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 14 Oct 06 10:38:14 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >> Now I'm beginning >>to think that these people don't know what a nuclear bomb is; >>it is possible that a lot of people think that it's just a >>roadside bomb with a slightly bigger bang. > > > They are worse than a horse with blinders on. Someone gouged out > their eyes, but it was right after they were fed a huge load of > bullshit. I think it was you she was talking about.
From: John Larkin on 14 Oct 2006 11:28
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:21:31 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >> >Its interesting that the other "non wins" you mention are from almost 200 >> >years ago. We have lost more recent wars as well. We can compare this to >> >Vietnam, I suppose. >> >> Which was a French mess and a continuation of WWII. > >It had ZILCH to do with WW2. > >Graham How could *anything* that happened after WWII have zilch to do with WWII? John |