Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 15 Oct 2006 18:24 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:03:52 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >You never responded to my question about your alignment with global cartels. >As your attitude and posting signal you are indeed so aligned, I will assume >your lack of response means yes. --- Not necessarily. I don't generally read your posts since you seem to be nominally sensible and reading _all_ the posts in this thread is tiresome. Also, sometimes I read a post and disagree with it, but just don't want to be bothered with answering it and starting another long harangue. --- >>>You're utterly mad. >> >> --- >> From Gershwin's "They all laughed": >> >> >> ..."They all laughed at Christopher Columbus >> When he said the world was round >> They all laughed when Edison recorded sound >> They all laughed at Wilbur and his brother >> When they said that man could fly >> >> They told Marconi >> Wireless was a phony >> It's the same old cry"... > >Yet they also tell people who are mad they are mad. For every Wright brother >there are millions of idiots and nutcases around the world. The odds are >stacked against genius. --- And yet... :-) -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: T Wake on 15 Oct 2006 18:26 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4532B315.B025D6E4(a)hotmail.com... > > > JoeBloe wrote: > >> No, it was not in any way, shape, or form a threat > > So you admit to 'saying things' you don't mean then ? I don't think Joe can help himself. He is so determined to argue and say things, he has lost focus on what it is he is trying to say. Its a shame medical help costs so much in the US. Joe really does need it.
From: Eeyore on 15 Oct 2006 18:26 JoeBloe wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >JoeBloe wrote: > >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >> > >> >More 'Christian' propaganda you willingly lapped up ? > >> > >> You're an idiot. Now that you have been pegged, and proven to be a > >> US hater, you try to switch it to Christian hater. > > > >I respect ppl's right to practice religion. I'm offended by any religion > >that inspires ignorance though lies whether that be Christian, Moslem or > >other. > > All of Islam (read the moslems) believe that all others that are not > moslem are "infidels" and that killing them is not, nor should not be > a crime. > > I have a problem with that. Do you not have a problem with that? If it was true I would have a problem with it. It's simply not true though. Do you really believe that nonsense ? Graham
From: T Wake on 15 Oct 2006 18:28 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:i1d5j2pdr5simfhpaumjlf6ku3b0piudg9(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:23:26 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >> >> >>JoeBloe wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:02:44 +0100, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >>> >>> >More 'Christian' propaganda you willingly lapped up ? >>> >>> You're an idiot. Now that you have been pegged, and proven to be a >>> US hater, you try to switch it to Christian hater. >> >>I respect ppl's right to practice religion. I'm offended by any religion >>that inspires ignorance though lies whether that be Christian, Moslem or >>other. > > All of Islam (read the moslems) believe that all others that are not > moslem are "infidels" and that killing them is not, nor should not be > a crime. > > I have a problem with that. Do you not have a problem with that? Oh look. Groundhog day is back. Go back, read some of the posts from last week. Learn that the interpretation of the Koran differs among people in the same way as the OT/NT interpretation differ amongst Christians and Christian nations. Look at Islamic countries. See how many aren't actually beheading infidels all over the place. Look at Christian history. Examine the Papal Bulls which exhort Christians to kill all non-Christians in the exact same manner. Realise this is not going on either. Then, and maybe then, you can hold a conversation like an adult.
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 18:30
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:28:26 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >JoeBloe wrote: > >> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:51:08 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >> >It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the >> >Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy." >> >> My intent is not to annoy. If you get annoyed, that's your problem. > >It's now your problem sunshine. > >You can fix that ( the federal offence ) by posting using your real name btw. > I do not have a problem, dipshit. Over here "offence" is not a word. That is aside from the fact that no such violation has taken place. |