Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 15 Oct 2006 18:41 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:i1d5j2pdr5simfhpaumjlf6ku3b0piudg9(a)4ax.com... > All of Islam (read the moslems) believe that all others that are not > moslem are "infidels" and that killing them is not, nor should not be > a crime. More right wing fear-mongering propaganda, the only legitimate purpose of which was to keep Republicans in power, and that you have swallowed whole. Do you *ever* think for yourself? Eric Lucas
From: John Larkin on 15 Oct 2006 18:42 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:58:38 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> >> "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote >> >> >> >> > It's hard to give up the cop >> >> > business after doing it for so long. >> >> >> >> Yep, therein lies the whole problem, along with the extremely fine >> >> distinction between legitimately policing world security and bullying. >> > >> >Part of the problem I suspect is that the USA is now addicted to pushing >> >foreigners around. >> >> --- >> Actually, it's the other way around. > >Funny. JL agreed ! But I did express the opinion that the "cop" role was taken on involuntarily, to save civilization as we (and you) defined it, and that we'd give it up if any responsible world organization would make it unnecessary. >Whilst I condemn any such action one can't help wonder why your forces are >all over the world. Originally, to defend Europe, Japan, Korea, Taiwan. I think it's time to pull out of the European bases and let them pay for their own defense, now that they don't need much of it. John
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 18:43 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:45:45 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan(a)easystreet.com> Gave us: >I would rather a free expression forum, even if that means people go >around making threats. The place I'd draw the line would be when they >make "credible threats." It would be the credibility of that threat >that would trigger, for me, the willingness to get authorities >involved. > >That's how I see it, anyway. i think that the DomkTARD is too retarded to even grasp what you have said.
From: lucasea on 15 Oct 2006 18:44 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:9g95j2la9hqkbiletfg73ulr826og8a3q3(a)4ax.com... > By winning, we fought and bought our way from ocean to ocean and > have become the most powerful nation on the Earth. Pretty important > war, ISTM. Only if your sense of self-worth happens to include being a big, arrogant bully. Funny, there are lots of people on earth who are perfectly happy without that ego boost. Eric Lucas
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 18:45
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:47:07 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >Under the law it has merely to be perceived as a threat to come under its >jurisdiction. After all, any thug can say "I didn't really mean it " ! > Any asswipe from another country can cry wolf too. Shame is that you should have someone knocking on your door, and you should be in the pokey for the bullshit you have pulled in this thread alone. |