Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 15 Oct 2006 18:31 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:19:39 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >T Wake wrote: > >> "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote >> >> > It's hard to give up the cop >> > business after doing it for so long. >> >> Police are accountable to the people they police, right or wrong. The US is >> accountable to no one. It is not a global police force. > >Not even accountable to the International Court in fact. I wonder why that is ? >Something to do with being held to account maybe ? --- Nope, it's because we're so thoroughly disliked that if any of us were ever brought into an international court, for any reason, it would be impossible for us to get a fair trial. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Jamie on 15 Oct 2006 21:57 JoeBloe wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:36:41 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > > >>I agree. You really should. > > > > In the habit of post editing folks words now? How quaint. > It's a shame I can't come over there and post edit your face. Joe, you need a little financial assistants for that ticket across the pond? :)) -- "I am never wrong, once i thought i was, but i was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 18:32 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:38:12 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >Isn't that the case for everyone? Doesn't everyone have to define their own >ethical compass? > Hahahahaha! That's rich.
From: John Fields on 15 Oct 2006 18:35 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:22:34 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote >> >> >> Why do you think that the first goal of the US is to be liked by everyone? >> > >> >That's a strawman. Our goal should be not to be hated by everyone. >> >> That is wrong. Our goal should be to know what is in the >> best interest of the nation and its people. Reacting to >> threats to national security with growls instead of swift >> and lethal bites is a sign of weakness; this becomes an open >> invitation to anybody who would like to take over the real >> estate. > >You reckon that 'radical Islam' wants to invade the USA ? --- No. They want us to fall apart because of fear and the inability to deal with terrorism, then we'd be easy pickings. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Jamie on 15 Oct 2006 22:05
T Wake wrote: > "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message > news:bmh4j2d77br4hfvi6bpt28sj4rj7o5hffj(a)4ax.com... > >>On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:36:41 +0100, "T Wake" >><usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >> >>>I agree. You really should. >> >> In the habit of post editing folks words now? How quaint. > > > Well, as you seem more than happy to remove anythin resembling context in > other people's posts I didnt think you would mind. > > Obviously I forgot how hypocritical you can be. > > >>It's a shame I can't come over there and post edit your face. > > > Why not? Are you banned from leaving your house? I will be in the US soon on > business if you want to meet up. > > You can talk as hard as you like on USENET. In reality you obviously have > all manner of issues so I would hardly deem you a threat to even small > children, let alone an adult. > > Please, keep on building these smokescreens to evade having to actually > answer the questions. I realise you cant keep up with the flow of > conversation (with USENET being such a _fast_ exchange media) but if you > tried to answer each post it would help. Replying to the voices in your head > is getting you no where. > > JoeBlow has friends :) -- "I am never wrong, once i thought i was, but i was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5 |