Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 16:13 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:51:08 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the >Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy." My intent is not to annoy. If you get annoyed, that's your problem. Get a clue, you stupid fucks.
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 16:20 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:46:44 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:r8u4j2hmpu3rasu0p0se9mked9nn6g0cjq(a)4ax.com... >> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:52:33 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >>>news:14oqi297a2fr8b4fgkpbkm0p3nnq61kq12(a)4ax.com... >>>> You guys? >>>> >>>> You'd tremble at the prospect of it unless you had the US to back >>>> you up, and you have the temerity to believe that we'd defend you if >>>> you were wrong? >>> >>>Really? Is this an unspported assertion in order that you may score some >>>points against Eeyore? >>> >>>I can certainly think of occasions where the UK has _not_ had US back up >>>in >>>military operations. That said, our military is about 1/10th the size of >>>the >>>US military so expecting the same is a fallacy all on its own. >> >> --- >> Missed this the first time around, sorry... >> >> The fact is that the UK _always_ has US backup in any of her >> military (ad)ventures, should she need it. Tacit, and she knows it. >> > >Only when our interests collide. Which has not been the case for all our >"wars." > No... ALWAYS, and you spelled "coincide" incorrectly.
From: Jonathan Kirwan on 15 Oct 2006 16:21 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:17:57 -0700, JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: ><snip> >I know my rights, and the law you twits keep spewing on about will >get shot down in the supreme court, whether by me or another. Actually, I hope you are right about the Supreme Court on this subject. Jon
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 16:28 On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:28:43 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster(a)hogwarts.physics_b> Gave us: >Hmm... a moose-sized Top posting Usenet retards should also get ignored. Announcing filter file edits are nearly just as retarded as top posting.
From: JoeBloe on 15 Oct 2006 16:30
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:31:14 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> Gave us: >On 15 Oct 2006 09:18:03 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at> >wrote: > > >> >> >>You are really one of the most worse cultures ever been. >> >> > >The US has almost no native culture. We absorbed very little, other >than place names, from the Native Americans or from Mexico. Most >American culture was imported from Europe, notably Britain, Ireland, >Germany, France, Italy, and Scandanavia, later mixed with substantial >Asian and African inputs. If there is any native culture, its the >legacy of the Wild West, and the only real native cuisine is barbeque. > >Don't blame the US for American culture, blame the world. > A related film: "The Gangs of New York" |